DKNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 9.06%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 5.39%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.69, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $305.39 which suggests that it could grow by 13.96%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment PLC, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment PLC.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.759%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.7B. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $332M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 92.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.24x versus 3.39x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of -0.17%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.69, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.32%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than DraftKings, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than DraftKings.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.901%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $60.4M. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Inspired Entertainment's net income of -$100K. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 3.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.24x versus 0.80x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 10.59%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.69, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $111.29 which suggests that it could grow by 17.8%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.33%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $774M. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $82M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 25.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.24x versus 2.64x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -2.4% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 2.03%. DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 4.52%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $52.69, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.38%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.752, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.198%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $262.4M. DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $5.3M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 182.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.24x versus 2.37x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.