PTMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of -6.04% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 99.99%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of -5.55% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.92 which suggests that it could fall by -1.44%. Given that Portman Ridge Finance has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Portman Ridge Finance is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.355%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.04%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Portman Ridge Finance pays -425.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Portman Ridge Finance quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Portman Ridge Finance's net income of -$82K is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Portman Ridge Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.69x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Portman Ridge Finance is 31.08x versus 8.42x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logan Ridge Finance has a net margin of -6.04% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 8.95%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of -5.55% beat Logan Ridge Finance's return on equity of -8.45%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Logan Ridge Finance has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Logan Ridge Finance has higher upside potential than Portman Ridge Finance, analysts believe Logan Ridge Finance is more attractive than Portman Ridge Finance.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logan Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.795, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.539%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.04%. Logan Ridge Finance offers a yield of 7.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Portman Ridge Finance pays -425.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Logan Ridge Finance pays out -12313.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are larger than Logan Ridge Finance quarterly revenues of -$4.1M. Portman Ridge Finance's net income of -$82K is higher than Logan Ridge Finance's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Portman Ridge Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.69x while Logan Ridge Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Portman Ridge Finance is 31.08x versus 9.38x for Logan Ridge Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -6.04% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 95.41%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of -5.55% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.19%. Given that Portman Ridge Finance has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Portman Ridge Finance is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.263%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.04%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Portman Ridge Finance pays -425.58% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Portman Ridge Finance's net income of -$82K is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Portman Ridge Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.69x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Portman Ridge Finance is 31.08x versus 9.89x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of -6.04% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 90.2%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of -5.55% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.74%. Given that Portman Ridge Finance has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Portman Ridge Finance is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.445%.

Portman Ridge Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.04%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Portman Ridge Finance pays -425.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Portman Ridge Finance's net income of -$82K is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Portman Ridge Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.69x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 111.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Portman Ridge Finance is 31.08x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.