META Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 39.34% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 38.28%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 35.17%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $705.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.01%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $200.56 which suggests that it could grow by 31.3%. Given that Alphabet has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Alphabet is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.65999999999999%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out 7.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $42.3B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $90.2B. Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $34.5B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 17.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.05x versus 5.25x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 39.34% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 27.42%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74% beat Netflix's return on equity of 40.31%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $705.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.01%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,096.58 which suggests that it could fall by -3.83%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Netflix.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.582, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.163%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $42.3B, which are larger than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B is higher than Netflix's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Netflix's PE ratio is 53.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.05x versus 12.43x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinterest has a net margin of 39.34% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 3.4%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74% beat Pinterest's return on equity of 54.52%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $705.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.01%. On the other hand Pinterest has an analysts' consensus of $40.41 which suggests that it could grow by 38.31%. Given that Pinterest has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Pinterest is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinterest has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.974%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Pinterest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinterest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $42.3B, which are larger than Pinterest quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B is higher than Pinterest's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Pinterest's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.05x versus 5.40x for Pinterest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap has a net margin of 39.34% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of -10.24%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74% beat Snap's return on equity of -23.83%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $705.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.01%. On the other hand Snap has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.24%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Snap, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Snap.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.304%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Snap offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $42.3B, which are larger than Snap quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B is higher than Snap's net income of -$139.6M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.11x while Snap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.05x versus 2.49x for Snap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.