LTBR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of -- compared to Lightbridge's net margin of 17.76%. Lightbridge's return on equity of -- beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

Lightbridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 826.47%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $211.11 which suggests that it could fall by -5.58%. Given that Lightbridge has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe Lightbridge is more attractive than Cintas.

Lightbridge has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.509%.

Lightbridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Lightbridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lightbridge quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Lightbridge's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Lightbridge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cintas's PE ratio is 51.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightbridge is 1,240.33x versus 9.07x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of -- compared to Lightbridge's net margin of -34.03%. Lightbridge's return on equity of -- beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

Lightbridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 826.47%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 75.44%. Given that Lightbridge has higher upside potential than Resources Connection, analysts believe Lightbridge is more attractive than Resources Connection.

Lightbridge has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.175%.

Lightbridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 10.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Lightbridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lightbridge quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Lightbridge's net income of -$4.8M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Lightbridge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightbridge is 1,240.33x versus 0.33x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lightbridge's net margin of -0.38%. Lightbridge's return on equity of -- beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Lightbridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 826.47%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 548.15%. Given that Lightbridge has higher upside potential than SPAR Group, analysts believe Lightbridge is more attractive than SPAR Group.

Lightbridge has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.378, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.192%.

Lightbridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightbridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightbridge quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Lightbridge's net income of -$4.8M is lower than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Lightbridge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightbridge is 1,240.33x versus 0.13x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of -- compared to Lightbridge's net margin of 5.79%. Lightbridge's return on equity of -- beat Transcat's return on equity of 5.48%.

Lightbridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 826.47%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $97.94 which suggests that it could grow by 26.55%. Given that Lightbridge has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Lightbridge is more attractive than Transcat.

Lightbridge has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.87%.

Lightbridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightbridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightbridge quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Transcat quarterly revenues of $77.1M. Lightbridge's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Transcat's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Lightbridge's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transcat's PE ratio is 49.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightbridge is 1,240.33x versus 2.58x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.