TRNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Transcat's net margin of 17.76%. Transcat's return on equity of 5.48% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $97.94, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $211.11 which suggests that it could fall by -7.27%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than Cintas.

Transcat has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.509%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $77.1M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Transcat's net income of $4.5M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.99x while Cintas's PE ratio is 52.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.60x versus 9.23x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Transcat's net margin of -34.03%. Transcat's return on equity of 5.48% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $97.94, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 88.07%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.175%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 10.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $77.1M, which are smaller than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Transcat's net income of $4.5M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.99x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.60x versus 0.31x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Transcat's net margin of -0.38%. Transcat's return on equity of 5.48% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $97.94, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 566.67%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.378, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.192%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $77.1M, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Transcat's net income of $4.5M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.99x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.60x versus 0.13x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Transcat's net margin of 30.85%. Transcat's return on equity of 5.48% beat Verisk Analytics's return on equity of 386.24%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $97.94, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Verisk Analytics has an analysts' consensus of $305.20 which suggests that it could fall by -4.16%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than Verisk Analytics, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than Verisk Analytics.

Transcat has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.807%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verisk Analytics offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 23.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $77.1M, which are smaller than Verisk Analytics quarterly revenues of $753M. Transcat's net income of $4.5M is lower than Verisk Analytics's net income of $232.3M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.99x while Verisk Analytics's PE ratio is 46.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.60x versus 15.49x for Verisk Analytics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.