LMFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -1816.14%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 4.22%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 169.06%. On the other hand Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.77%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.523%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP offers a yield of 14.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays out 78.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are larger than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues of $255.3K. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's PE ratio is 16.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.34x versus 6.62x for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navient has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -1.13%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat Navient's return on equity of 2.85%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 169.06%. On the other hand Navient has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.48%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Navient.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.499%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Navient offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient pays out 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than Navient quarterly revenues of $177M. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Navient's net income of -$2M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Navient's PE ratio is 19.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.34x versus 1.62x for Navient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 12.87%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 21.65%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 169.06%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $93.69 which suggests that it could grow by 6.17%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than PayPal Holdings.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.017%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1B. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 21.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.34x versus 2.96x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WTB Financial A has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 13.76%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 169.06%. On the other hand WTB Financial A has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than WTB Financial A.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.356, which suggesting that the stock is 35.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.175, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.47%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WTB Financial A offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WTB Financial A pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than WTB Financial A quarterly revenues of $86.1M. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WTB Financial A's PE ratio is 27.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.34x versus 3.67x for WTB Financial A. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.