Financhill
Sell
44

KC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.93
Seasonality move :
-6.54%
Day range:
$8.96 - $9.51
52-week range:
$2.02 - $9.77
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.22x
P/B ratio:
2.96x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
4.2M
1-year change:
155.07%
Market cap:
$2.2B
Revenue:
$996.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.19

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
$273.3M -$0.15 20.9% -34.9% $6.89
GDS
GDS Holdings
$413.5M -$0.16 20.65% -92.48% $24.80
JFU
9F
-- -- -- -- --
JG
Aurora Mobile
$9.8M -$0.40 2.03% -8.28% --
VNET
VNET Group
$279.8M $0.03 7.22% -96.91% --
XIACY
Xiaomi
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
$9.31 $6.89 $2.2B -- $0.00 0% 2.22x
GDS
GDS Holdings
$19.68 $24.80 $3.8B -- $0.00 0% 2.37x
JFU
9F
$1.50 -- $17.7M 8.99x $0.00 0% 0.43x
JG
Aurora Mobile
$6.16 -- $36.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.88x
VNET
VNET Group
$3.62 -- $966.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.80x
XIACY
Xiaomi
$20.57 -- $102.7B 39.80x $0.00 0% 2.36x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
31% 5.414 44.17% 0.40x
GDS
GDS Holdings
67.56% -1.700 120.54% 1.12x
JFU
9F
-- 1.799 -- 5.48x
JG
Aurora Mobile
4.17% 1.318 0.93% 0.59x
VNET
VNET Group
62.91% 1.234 131.65% 0.44x
XIACY
Xiaomi
14.8% -0.307 -- 1.12x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
$42.4M -$31.3M -24.59% -27.92% -52.66% $31.8M
GDS
GDS Holdings
$91.7M $44.7M -6.39% -17.84% 9.91% -$317.3M
JFU
9F
-- -- 0.22% 0.22% -- --
JG
Aurora Mobile
$7.4M -$508.9K -21.38% -21.95% -2.71% --
VNET
VNET Group
$68.7M $26.7M -12.91% -33.59% 21.52% $89.1M
XIACY
Xiaomi
$2.6B $768.9M 10.21% 10.33% 7.54% --

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns KC or GDS?

    GDS Holdings has a net margin of -56.06% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of -6.49%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92% beat GDS Holdings's return on equity of -17.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    16.09% -$0.61 $1.1B
    GDS
    GDS Holdings
    22.15% -$0.16 $9.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About KC or GDS?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.89, signalling downside risk potential of -26.07%. On the other hand GDS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.80 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    6 2 0
    GDS
    GDS Holdings
    9 2 0
  • Is KC or GDS More Risky?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.184, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.555%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or GDS?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings pays out -1.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or GDS?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.4M, which are smaller than GDS Holdings quarterly revenues of $414.2M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M is lower than GDS Holdings's net income of -$26.9M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GDS Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.22x versus 2.37x for GDS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    2.22x -- $263.4M -$147.6M
    GDS
    GDS Holdings
    2.37x -- $414.2M -$26.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns KC or JFU?

    9F has a net margin of -56.06% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    16.09% -$0.61 $1.1B
    JFU
    9F
    -- -- $496.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About KC or JFU?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.89, signalling downside risk potential of -26.07%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12033.89%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    6 2 0
    JFU
    9F
    0 0 0
  • Is KC or JFU More Risky?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.118%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or JFU?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or JFU?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.4M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 9F's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.22x versus 0.43x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    2.22x -- $263.4M -$147.6M
    JFU
    9F
    0.43x 8.99x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns KC or JG?

    Aurora Mobile has a net margin of -56.06% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of -3.27%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92% beat Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -21.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    16.09% -$0.61 $1.1B
    JG
    Aurora Mobile
    67.31% -$0.06 $14.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About KC or JG?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.89, signalling downside risk potential of -26.07%. On the other hand Aurora Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.55%. Given that Aurora Mobile has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe Aurora Mobile is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    6 2 0
    JG
    Aurora Mobile
    0 0 0
  • Is KC or JG More Risky?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.161%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or JG?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or JG?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.4M, which are larger than Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues of $11M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M is lower than Aurora Mobile's net income of -$360.5K. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aurora Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.22x versus 0.88x for Aurora Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    2.22x -- $263.4M -$147.6M
    JG
    Aurora Mobile
    0.88x -- $11M -$360.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns KC or VNET?

    VNET Group has a net margin of -56.06% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of 14.98%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92% beat VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    16.09% -$0.61 $1.1B
    VNET
    VNET Group
    23.18% $0.04 $2.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About KC or VNET?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.89, signalling downside risk potential of -26.07%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.23%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    6 2 0
    VNET
    VNET Group
    0 0 0
  • Is KC or VNET More Risky?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of -0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.173%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or VNET?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or VNET?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.4M, which are smaller than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $296.2M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M is lower than VNET Group's net income of $44.4M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.22x versus 0.80x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    2.22x -- $263.4M -$147.6M
    VNET
    VNET Group
    0.80x -- $296.2M $44.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns KC or XIACY?

    Xiaomi has a net margin of -56.06% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of 5.79%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92% beat Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    16.09% -$0.61 $1.1B
    XIACY
    Xiaomi
    20.41% $0.15 $28B
  • What do Analysts Say About KC or XIACY?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.89, signalling downside risk potential of -26.07%. On the other hand Xiaomi has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    6 2 0
    XIACY
    Xiaomi
    0 0 0
  • Is KC or XIACY More Risky?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xiaomi has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.052%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or XIACY?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xiaomi offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xiaomi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or XIACY?

    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.4M, which are smaller than Xiaomi quarterly revenues of $12.9B. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M is lower than Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xiaomi's PE ratio is 39.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.22x versus 2.36x for Xiaomi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KC
    Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
    2.22x -- $263.4M -$147.6M
    XIACY
    Xiaomi
    2.36x 39.80x $12.9B $747.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?

Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…

NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?

If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.

Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24

Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.

Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock