INSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -26.81%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.54%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 35.15%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than DraftKings, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than DraftKings.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.771%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.82x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.87x versus 4.01x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of 7.83%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.54%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $109.94 which suggests that it could grow by 27.8%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.06%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $817M. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $64M. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.82x while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.87x versus 2.50x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -6.67%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.54%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.82x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.87x versus 1.33x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -100.39%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat SharpLink Gaming's return on equity of --.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.54%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than SharpLink Gaming, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than SharpLink Gaming.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.242%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SharpLink Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming quarterly revenues of $881.7K. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M is higher than SharpLink Gaming's net income of -$885.1K. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.82x while SharpLink Gaming's PE ratio is 0.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.87x versus 0.71x for SharpLink Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.