HLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 14.6%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $183.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.562%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 19.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.54x versus 3.40x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 4.96%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 1.99%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $183.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.15 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than Blue Owl Capital, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than Blue Owl Capital.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Blue Owl Capital offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital pays out 456.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital's is not.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are smaller than Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues of $600.9M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is higher than Blue Owl Capital's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while Blue Owl Capital's PE ratio is 784.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.54x versus 8.37x for Blue Owl Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of -7.31%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $183.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Principal Financial Group's is not.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.54x versus 1.31x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 28.82%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $183.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.098% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.54x versus 5.43x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.