GWRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of -324.75%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -104.01%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.52%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 318.06%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Global Water Resources, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Global Water Resources.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.582%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.96x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.91x versus 18.66x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H2O America has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 9.88%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat H2O America's return on equity of 7.47%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.52%. On the other hand H2O America has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.36%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than H2O America, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than H2O America.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H2O America has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.457%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. H2O America offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. H2O America pays out 55.48% of its earnings as a dividend. H2O America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are smaller than H2O America quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is lower than H2O America's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.96x while H2O America's PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.91x versus 2.35x for H2O America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 21.4%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.78%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.52%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of $66.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.84%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Middlesex Water, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Middlesex Water.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.975%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 53.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $44.3M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.96x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 23.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.91x versus 5.16x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 20.25%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat Pure Cycle's return on equity of 11.05%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.52%. On the other hand Pure Cycle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -37.74%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.316%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Pure Cycle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Cycle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are larger than Pure Cycle quarterly revenues of $4M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is lower than Pure Cycle's net income of $809K. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.96x while Pure Cycle's PE ratio is 18.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.91x versus 8.50x for Pure Cycle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.