GWRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Water Works has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 17.95%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat American Water Works's return on equity of 10.42%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 49.76%. On the other hand American Water Works has an analysts' consensus of $142.24 which suggests that it could fall by -0.95%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than American Water Works, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than American Water Works.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Water Works has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.478%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. American Water Works offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. American Water Works pays out 55.66% of its earnings as a dividend. American Water Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are smaller than American Water Works quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is lower than American Water Works's net income of $205M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.00x while American Water Works's PE ratio is 26.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.71x versus 5.82x for American Water Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American States Water has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 18.14%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat American States Water's return on equity of 14.01%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 49.76%. On the other hand American States Water has an analysts' consensus of $84.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.43%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than American States Water, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than American States Water.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American States Water has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.697%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. American States Water offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water pays out 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are smaller than American States Water quarterly revenues of $148M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is lower than American States Water's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.00x while American States Water's PE ratio is 24.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.71x versus 4.89x for American States Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadiz has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of -324.75%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -104.01%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 49.76%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 359.56%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Global Water Resources, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Global Water Resources.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.899%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.00x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.71x versus 16.97x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Essential Utilities has a net margin of 4.74% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 36.22%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 10.58% beat Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.87%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 49.76%. On the other hand Essential Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $45.56 which suggests that it could grow by 17.23%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.832%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Essential Utilities offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $12.5M, which are smaller than Essential Utilities quarterly revenues of $783.6M. Global Water Resources's net income of $591K is lower than Essential Utilities's net income of $283.8M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.00x while Essential Utilities's PE ratio is 17.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.71x versus 4.73x for Essential Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.