PCYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz has a net margin of 20.25% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of -324.75%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 11.05% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -104.01%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.01%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 300.64%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.582%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $4M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3M. Pure Cycle's net income of $809K is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 19.47x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H2O America has a net margin of 20.25% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 9.88%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 11.05% beat H2O America's return on equity of 7.47%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.01%. On the other hand H2O America has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.69%. Given that H2O America has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe H2O America is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H2O America has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.457%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H2O America offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H2O America pays out 55.48% of its earnings as a dividend. H2O America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than H2O America quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Pure Cycle's net income of $809K is lower than H2O America's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while H2O America's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 2.25x for H2O America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 20.25% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 21.4%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 11.05% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.78%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.01%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of $66.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.69%. Given that Middlesex Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Middlesex Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.975%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 53.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $44.3M. Pure Cycle's net income of $809K is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 22.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 5.00x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The York Water has a net margin of 20.25% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 19.71%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 11.05% beat The York Water's return on equity of 8.61%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.01%. On the other hand The York Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.77%. Given that The York Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe The York Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The York Water has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.396%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The York Water offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water pays out 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than The York Water quarterly revenues of $18.5M. Pure Cycle's net income of $809K is lower than The York Water's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while The York Water's PE ratio is 23.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 6.03x for The York Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.