ADNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of -2.54%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.85%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 117.39%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.689, which suggesting that the stock is 68.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.11%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.13x versus 0.08x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 11.33%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.85%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.53%. Given that Dorman Products has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe Dorman Products is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.689, which suggesting that the stock is 68.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.269%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 17.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.13x versus 1.89x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of -3528.43%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.85%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.99%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.689, which suggesting that the stock is 68.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.13x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of -7.21%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat Monro's return on equity of -0.8%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.85, signalling upside risk potential of 3.85%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.71%. Given that Monro has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe Monro is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.689, which suggesting that the stock is 68.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.488%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 7.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Monro quarterly revenues of $295M. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than Monro's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while Monro's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.13x versus 0.41x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.