GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of -3.72%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 88.68%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Flexible Solutions International, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Flexible Solutions International.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.469%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 30.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.51x versus 1.88x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of -32.15%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 88.68%. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -1.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.198%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $10.9M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.51x versus 0.02x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 2.28%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 8.17%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 88.68%. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $69.16 which suggests that it could grow by 10.56%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than LyondellBasell Industries NV, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than LyondellBasell Industries NV.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.63%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 8.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 126.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but LyondellBasell Industries NV's is not.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of $175M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 19.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.51x versus 0.54x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Technologies International has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 2.28%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 5.18%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 88.68%. On the other hand Northern Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.54%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.291, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.929%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Northern Technologies International offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International pays out 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are larger than Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than Northern Technologies International's net income of $434.3K. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Northern Technologies International's PE ratio is 21.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.51x versus 0.96x for Northern Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.