FWRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of 3.38%. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $23.82, signalling upside risk potential of 24.57%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $128.38 which suggests that it could fall by -7.3%. Given that First Watch Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe First Watch Restaurant Group is more attractive than Brinker International.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.94x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 33.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.19x versus 1.40x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foodbase Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Foodbase Group's return on equity of --.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $23.82, signalling upside risk potential of 24.57%. On the other hand Foodbase Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Watch Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Foodbase Group, analysts believe First Watch Restaurant Group is more attractive than Foodbase Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foodbase Group has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.623%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foodbase Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foodbase Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are larger than Foodbase Group quarterly revenues of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is higher than Foodbase Group's net income of --. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.94x while Foodbase Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.19x versus 0.01x for Foodbase Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Giant Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Giant Group's return on equity of --.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $23.82, signalling upside risk potential of 24.57%. On the other hand Giant Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Watch Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Giant Group, analysts believe First Watch Restaurant Group is more attractive than Giant Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Group has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.806%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are larger than Giant Group quarterly revenues of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is higher than Giant Group's net income of --. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.94x while Giant Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.19x versus -- for Giant Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Potbelly has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of 3.24%. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Potbelly's return on equity of 139.56%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $23.82, signalling upside risk potential of 24.57%. On the other hand Potbelly has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 69.06%. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than First Watch Restaurant Group, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than First Watch Restaurant Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Potbelly has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.879%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Potbelly offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Potbelly pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are larger than Potbelly quarterly revenues of $115.1M. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is lower than Potbelly's net income of $3.7M. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.94x while Potbelly's PE ratio is 7.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.19x versus 0.58x for Potbelly. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.