FCEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloom Energy has a net margin of -83.96% compared to FuelCell Energy's net margin of -4.45%. FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -17.09% beat Bloom Energy's return on equity of -26.8%.

FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $10.02, signalling downside risk potential of -3.45%. On the other hand Bloom Energy has an analysts' consensus of $16.33 which suggests that it could fall by -6.62%. Given that Bloom Energy has more downside risk than FuelCell Energy, analysts believe FuelCell Energy is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.641, which suggesting that the stock is 264.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 203.66%.

FuelCell Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bloom Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are smaller than Bloom Energy quarterly revenues of $330.4M. FuelCell Energy's net income of -$41.4M is lower than Bloom Energy's net income of -$14.7M. Notably, FuelCell Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bloom Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy is 1.53x versus 4.37x for Bloom Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Majic Wheels has a net margin of -83.96% compared to FuelCell Energy's net margin of --. FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -17.09% beat Majic Wheels's return on equity of --.

FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $10.02, signalling downside risk potential of -3.45%. On the other hand Majic Wheels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FuelCell Energy has higher upside potential than Majic Wheels, analysts believe FuelCell Energy is more attractive than Majic Wheels.

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.641, which suggesting that the stock is 264.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Majic Wheels has a beta of 38.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3704.975%.

FuelCell Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Majic Wheels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Majic Wheels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are larger than Majic Wheels quarterly revenues of --. FuelCell Energy's net income of -$41.4M is higher than Majic Wheels's net income of --. Notably, FuelCell Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Majic Wheels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy is 1.53x versus -- for Majic Wheels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OriginClear has a net margin of -83.96% compared to FuelCell Energy's net margin of -241842.13%. FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -17.09% beat OriginClear's return on equity of --.

FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $10.02, signalling downside risk potential of -3.45%. On the other hand OriginClear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 603348.97%. Given that OriginClear has higher upside potential than FuelCell Energy, analysts believe OriginClear is more attractive than FuelCell Energy.

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.641, which suggesting that the stock is 264.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OriginClear has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.779%.

FuelCell Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OriginClear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OriginClear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are larger than OriginClear quarterly revenues of $6.6K. FuelCell Energy's net income of -$41.4M is lower than OriginClear's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, FuelCell Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OriginClear's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy is 1.53x versus 164.16x for OriginClear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a net margin of -83.96% compared to FuelCell Energy's net margin of 5.99%. FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -17.09% beat Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 21.88%.

FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $10.02, signalling downside risk potential of -3.45%. On the other hand Perma-Pipe International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FuelCell Energy has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe FuelCell Energy is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.641, which suggesting that the stock is 264.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.271%.

FuelCell Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are larger than Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues of $41.6M. FuelCell Energy's net income of -$41.4M is lower than Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $2.5M. Notably, FuelCell Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Pipe International Holdings's PE ratio is 8.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy is 1.53x versus 0.86x for Perma-Pipe International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.