BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of -4.45% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of --. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -26.8% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $16.33, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bloom Energy has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Bloom Energy is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.037, which suggesting that the stock is 203.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 20.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1967.037%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $330.4M, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Bloom Energy's net income of -$14.7M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 4.37x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -4.45% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -3675.58%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -26.8% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $16.33, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.34%. Given that NuScale Power has more downside risk than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Bloom Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.037, which suggesting that the stock is 203.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $330.4M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $475K. Bloom Energy's net income of -$14.7M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 4.37x versus 242.79x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPI Composites has a net margin of -4.45% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -10.52%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -26.8% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $16.33, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 113.59%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.037, which suggesting that the stock is 203.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 1.819, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.876%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $330.4M, which are smaller than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $380.8M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$14.7M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$40.1M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 4.37x versus 0.07x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -4.45% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -3.79%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -26.8% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $16.33, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.7%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.037, which suggesting that the stock is 203.66% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.147%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $330.4M, which are larger than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $72.9M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$14.7M is lower than Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 4.37x versus 0.52x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.