EPSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

National Fuel Gas has a net margin of 24.85% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of 29.64%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 4.49% beat National Fuel Gas's return on equity of 1.34%.

Epsilon Energy has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 7.55%. On the other hand National Fuel Gas has an analysts' consensus of $84.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.19%. Given that Epsilon Energy has higher upside potential than National Fuel Gas, analysts believe Epsilon Energy is more attractive than National Fuel Gas.

Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Fuel Gas has a beta of 0.622, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.752%.

Epsilon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. National Fuel Gas offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Epsilon Energy pays 284.62% of its earnings as a dividend. National Fuel Gas pays out 237.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Epsilon Energy quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are smaller than National Fuel Gas quarterly revenues of $730M. Epsilon Energy's net income of $4M is lower than National Fuel Gas's net income of $216.4M. Notably, Epsilon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while National Fuel Gas's PE ratio is 196.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Epsilon Energy is 4.34x versus 3.73x for National Fuel Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 24.85% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of 13.76%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 4.49% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

Epsilon Energy has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 7.55%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.89 which suggests that it could grow by 15.58%. Given that Occidental Petroleum has higher upside potential than Epsilon Energy, analysts believe Occidental Petroleum is more attractive than Epsilon Energy.

Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.313%.

Epsilon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Epsilon Energy pays 284.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Epsilon Energy's is not.

Epsilon Energy quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Epsilon Energy's net income of $4M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, Epsilon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Epsilon Energy is 4.34x versus 1.53x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PHX Minerals has a net margin of 24.85% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of 40.74%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 4.49% beat PHX Minerals's return on equity of 5.58%.

Epsilon Energy has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 7.55%. On the other hand PHX Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $4.35 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Epsilon Energy has higher upside potential than PHX Minerals, analysts believe Epsilon Energy is more attractive than PHX Minerals.

Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PHX Minerals has a beta of 0.055, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.508%.

Epsilon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. PHX Minerals offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Epsilon Energy pays 284.62% of its earnings as a dividend. PHX Minerals pays out 225.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Epsilon Energy quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than PHX Minerals quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Epsilon Energy's net income of $4M is lower than PHX Minerals's net income of $4.4M. Notably, Epsilon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while PHX Minerals's PE ratio is 22.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Epsilon Energy is 4.34x versus 4.25x for PHX Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 24.85% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of 11.52%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 4.49% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.

Epsilon Energy has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 7.55%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 346.82%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Epsilon Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Epsilon Energy.

Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.529%.

Epsilon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Epsilon Energy pays 284.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Epsilon Energy quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Epsilon Energy's net income of $4M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Epsilon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Epsilon Energy is 4.34x versus 0.44x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.