DLTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Etsy has a net margin of -1.46% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of -8%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -21.57% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $50.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.75%. Given that Duluth Holdings has higher upside potential than Etsy, analysts believe Duluth Holdings is more attractive than Etsy.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.778, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.77%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $241.3M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Etsy's PE ratio is 34.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.10x versus 2.11x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leslies has a net margin of -1.46% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of -28.97%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -21.57% beat Leslies's return on equity of --.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Leslies has an analysts' consensus of $1.37 which suggests that it could grow by 59.17%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leslies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leslies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $241.3M, which are larger than Leslies quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Leslies's net income of -$51.3M. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leslies's PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.10x versus 0.12x for Leslies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -1.46% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of 1.14%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -21.57% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44%.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 546.97%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.792%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 17.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $241.3M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 87.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.25x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of -1.46% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of 5.17%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -21.57% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $54.37 which suggests that it could grow by 9.4%. Given that Tractor Supply has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Tractor Supply is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.661%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $241.3M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 24.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.79x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.