DLTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citi Trends has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of 0.43%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -30.21%.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.38%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.77%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 1.941, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.09%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are smaller than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Citi Trends's net income of $871K. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.37x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of 5.17%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68% beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.38%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.81%. Given that Envela has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Envela is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.591%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 21.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.83x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirkland's has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of -6.71%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68% beat Kirkland's's return on equity of -1677.68%.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.38%. On the other hand Kirkland's has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -20%. Given that Kirkland's has more downside risk than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Duluth Holdings is more attractive than Kirkland's.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirkland's has a beta of 2.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.533%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kirkland's offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kirkland's pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are smaller than Kirkland's quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Kirkland's's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kirkland's's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.04x for Kirkland's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Duluth Holdings's net margin of 9.16%. Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68% beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08%.

Duluth Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.38%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $22.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.38%. Given that Victoria's Secret & has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Duluth Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duluth Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of $193M. Notably, Duluth Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 11.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duluth Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.29x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.