CRTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of 3.61%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than Lendway.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.955% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.885%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is higher than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.73x versus 0.20x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of -6.19%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $21.81 which suggests that it could fall by -9.59%. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than Magnite.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.955% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.224%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Magnite's PE ratio is 120.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.73x versus 5.34x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of 8.23%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $86.24 which suggests that it could grow by 17.36%. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.955% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.289%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $616M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 89.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.73x versus 14.39x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of 7.38%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 29.98%. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than Ziff Davis.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.955% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.999%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is higher than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.87x while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 19.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.73x versus 1.02x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.