TTD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of 8.23% compared to The Trade Desk's net margin of 38.84%. The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 229.75%.

The Trade Desk has a consensus price target of $86.48, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $463.20 which suggests that it could grow by 30.15%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Trade Desk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Trade Desk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Trade Desk quarterly revenues are $616M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.5B. The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $576.4M. Notably, The Trade Desk's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.99x while AppLovin's PE ratio is 64.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Trade Desk is 14.77x versus 24.04x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Integral Ad Science Holding has a net margin of 8.23% compared to The Trade Desk's net margin of 5.96%. The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02% beat Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8%.

The Trade Desk has a consensus price target of $86.48, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand Integral Ad Science Holding has an analysts' consensus of $13.39 which suggests that it could grow by 67.62%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Trade Desk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Integral Ad Science Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Trade Desk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Integral Ad Science Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Trade Desk quarterly revenues are $616M, which are larger than Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues of $134.1M. The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M is higher than Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M. Notably, The Trade Desk's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.99x while Integral Ad Science Holding's PE ratio is 27.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Trade Desk is 14.77x versus 2.41x for Integral Ad Science Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marchex has a net margin of 8.23% compared to The Trade Desk's net margin of -17.38%. The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02% beat Marchex's return on equity of -16.35%.

The Trade Desk has a consensus price target of $86.48, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand Marchex has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 99.01%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marchex has a beta of 1.891, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.147%.

The Trade Desk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marchex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Trade Desk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marchex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Trade Desk quarterly revenues are $616M, which are larger than Marchex quarterly revenues of $11.4M. The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M is higher than Marchex's net income of -$2M. Notably, The Trade Desk's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.99x while Marchex's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Trade Desk is 14.77x versus 2.01x for Marchex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 8.23% compared to The Trade Desk's net margin of -6.19%. The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

The Trade Desk has a consensus price target of $86.48, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $22.72 which suggests that it could fall by -1.67%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than Magnite.

The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.224%.

The Trade Desk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Trade Desk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Trade Desk quarterly revenues are $616M, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, The Trade Desk's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.99x while Magnite's PE ratio is 115.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Trade Desk is 14.77x versus 5.11x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.