CPSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credit Acceptance has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 18.91%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 6.72% beat Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 17.43%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.16%. On the other hand Credit Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of $495.25 which suggests that it could fall by -3.88%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.829%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Credit Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Credit Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues of $562.3M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.7M is lower than Credit Acceptance's net income of $106.3M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Credit Acceptance's PE ratio is 21.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.15x versus 2.89x for Credit Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IF Bancorp has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 15.8%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 6.72% beat IF Bancorp's return on equity of 4.34%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.16%. On the other hand IF Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than IF Bancorp, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than IF Bancorp.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IF Bancorp has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.385%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IF Bancorp offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp pays out 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $52M, which are larger than IF Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.7M is higher than IF Bancorp's net income of $1M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while IF Bancorp's PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.15x versus 3.14x for IF Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Card Group has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 3.89%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 6.72% beat CPI Card Group's return on equity of --.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.16%. On the other hand CPI Card Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.75 which suggests that it could grow by 65.99%. Given that CPI Card Group has higher upside potential than Consumer Portfolio Services, analysts believe CPI Card Group is more attractive than Consumer Portfolio Services.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Card Group has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.746%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Card Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Card Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than CPI Card Group quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.7M is lower than CPI Card Group's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while CPI Card Group's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.15x versus 0.54x for CPI Card Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sezzle has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 34.47%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 6.72% beat Sezzle's return on equity of 150.41%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.16%. On the other hand Sezzle has an analysts' consensus of $161.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Sezzle, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Sezzle.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sezzle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sezzle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Sezzle quarterly revenues of $104.9M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.7M is lower than Sezzle's net income of $36.2M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Sezzle's PE ratio is 45.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.15x versus 14.77x for Sezzle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.