CACC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consumer Portfolio Services has a net margin of 18.91% compared to Credit Acceptance's net margin of 9.04%. Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 17.43% beat Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 6.72%.

Credit Acceptance has a consensus price target of $495.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand Consumer Portfolio Services has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.16%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.886%.

Credit Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consumer Portfolio Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Credit Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consumer Portfolio Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues are $562.3M, which are larger than Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues of $52M. Credit Acceptance's net income of $106.3M is higher than Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Credit Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.95x while Consumer Portfolio Services's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Acceptance is 2.89x versus 1.15x for Consumer Portfolio Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IF Bancorp has a net margin of 18.91% compared to Credit Acceptance's net margin of 15.8%. Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 17.43% beat IF Bancorp's return on equity of 4.34%.

Credit Acceptance has a consensus price target of $495.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand IF Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Credit Acceptance has higher upside potential than IF Bancorp, analysts believe Credit Acceptance is more attractive than IF Bancorp.

Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IF Bancorp has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.385%.

Credit Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IF Bancorp offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Credit Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp pays out 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues are $562.3M, which are larger than IF Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Credit Acceptance's net income of $106.3M is higher than IF Bancorp's net income of $1M. Notably, Credit Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.95x while IF Bancorp's PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Acceptance is 2.89x versus 3.14x for IF Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Card Group has a net margin of 18.91% compared to Credit Acceptance's net margin of 3.89%. Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 17.43% beat CPI Card Group's return on equity of --.

Credit Acceptance has a consensus price target of $495.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand CPI Card Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.75 which suggests that it could grow by 65.99%. Given that CPI Card Group has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe CPI Card Group is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Card Group has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.746%.

Credit Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Card Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Credit Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Card Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues are $562.3M, which are larger than CPI Card Group quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Credit Acceptance's net income of $106.3M is higher than CPI Card Group's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Credit Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.95x while CPI Card Group's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Acceptance is 2.89x versus 0.54x for CPI Card Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sezzle has a net margin of 18.91% compared to Credit Acceptance's net margin of 34.47%. Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 17.43% beat Sezzle's return on equity of 150.41%.

Credit Acceptance has a consensus price target of $495.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand Sezzle has an analysts' consensus of $161.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that Sezzle has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe Sezzle is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Credit Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sezzle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Credit Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sezzle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues are $562.3M, which are larger than Sezzle quarterly revenues of $104.9M. Credit Acceptance's net income of $106.3M is higher than Sezzle's net income of $36.2M. Notably, Credit Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.95x while Sezzle's PE ratio is 45.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Acceptance is 2.89x versus 14.77x for Sezzle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.