BOKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 24.18% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 27.38%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $105.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.83%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.764%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $495.3M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 3.07x versus 3.01x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 24.18% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 36.31%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $105.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.89%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.773%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOK Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $495.3M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 3.07x versus 1.22x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 24.18% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 32.4%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $105.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.67 which suggests that it could grow by 4.13%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Park National.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.656%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Park National offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $495.3M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 3.07x versus 5.04x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 24.18% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 24.09%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $105.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.52%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than BOK Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than BOK Financial.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.302%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $495.3M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 3.07x versus 2.94x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.