AMAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 33.22%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 8.91%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Burke & Herbert Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.53%. Given that Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher upside potential than Amalgamated Financial, analysts believe Burke & Herbert Financial Services is more attractive than Amalgamated Financial.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.195, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.504%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays out 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues of $81.9M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is lower than Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Burke & Herbert Financial Services's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.04x versus 2.73x for Burke & Herbert Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 36.31%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.36%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.773%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amalgamated Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.04x versus 1.19x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 32.4%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.656%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Park National offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.04x versus 5.16x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 31.49% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 24.09%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 15.3% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.96%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Amalgamated Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Amalgamated Financial.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.302%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 13.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $25M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.04x versus 2.98x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.