ACVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoNation has a net margin of -9.36% compared to ACV Auctions's net margin of 2.82%. ACV Auctions's return on equity of -16.73% beat AutoNation's return on equity of 32.05%.

ACV Auctions has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 15.54%. On the other hand AutoNation has an analysts' consensus of $171.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.69%. Given that ACV Auctions has higher upside potential than AutoNation, analysts believe ACV Auctions is more attractive than AutoNation.

ACV Auctions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoNation has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.03%.

ACV Auctions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoNation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACV Auctions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoNation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACV Auctions quarterly revenues are $171.3M, which are smaller than AutoNation quarterly revenues of $6.6B. ACV Auctions's net income of -$16M is lower than AutoNation's net income of $185.8M. Notably, ACV Auctions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AutoNation's PE ratio is 10.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACV Auctions is 5.95x versus 0.27x for AutoNation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of -9.36% compared to ACV Auctions's net margin of 2.27%. ACV Auctions's return on equity of -16.73% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.55%.

ACV Auctions has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 15.54%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $397.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that ACV Auctions has higher upside potential than Lithia Motors, analysts believe ACV Auctions is more attractive than Lithia Motors.

ACV Auctions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.095%.

ACV Auctions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. ACV Auctions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 5.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACV Auctions quarterly revenues are $171.3M, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. ACV Auctions's net income of -$16M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.1M. Notably, ACV Auctions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACV Auctions is 5.95x versus 0.29x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of -9.36% compared to ACV Auctions's net margin of 2.98%. ACV Auctions's return on equity of -16.73% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 17.91%.

ACV Auctions has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 15.54%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that ACV Auctions has higher upside potential than Penske Automotive Group, analysts believe ACV Auctions is more attractive than Penske Automotive Group.

ACV Auctions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.766%.

ACV Auctions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share. ACV Auctions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 17.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACV Auctions quarterly revenues are $171.3M, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. ACV Auctions's net income of -$16M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $226.1M. Notably, ACV Auctions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 12.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACV Auctions is 5.95x versus 0.35x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Enterprises has a net margin of -9.36% compared to ACV Auctions's net margin of 4.17%. ACV Auctions's return on equity of -16.73% beat Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.54%.

ACV Auctions has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 15.54%. On the other hand Rush Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.13%. Given that Rush Enterprises has higher upside potential than ACV Auctions, analysts believe Rush Enterprises is more attractive than ACV Auctions.

ACV Auctions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Enterprises has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.052000000000008%.

ACV Auctions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Enterprises offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. ACV Auctions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises pays out 14.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACV Auctions quarterly revenues are $171.3M, which are smaller than Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ACV Auctions's net income of -$16M is lower than Rush Enterprises's net income of $79.1M. Notably, ACV Auctions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Enterprises's PE ratio is 14.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACV Auctions is 5.95x versus 0.57x for Rush Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.