ACAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of 7.77% compared to ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -49.65%. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of 37.45% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $24.37, signalling upside risk potential of 38.46%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 42.86%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.543% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.08%.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net income of $19M is higher than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals is 2.95x versus 0.16x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nanoviricides has a net margin of 7.77% compared to ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of 37.45% beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $24.37, signalling upside risk potential of 38.46%. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 415.87%. Given that Nanoviricides has higher upside potential than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Nanoviricides is more attractive than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.543% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.32%.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net income of $19M is higher than Nanoviricides's net income of -$2M. Notably, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals is 2.95x versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of 7.77% compared to ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of 37.45% beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $24.37, signalling upside risk potential of 38.46%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 410.73%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.543% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.138%.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net income of $19M is higher than Oragenics's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals is 2.95x versus 1.22x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of 7.77% compared to ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of 37.45% beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $24.37, signalling upside risk potential of 38.46%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1134.13%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.543% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.418%.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's net income of $19M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals is 2.95x versus 0.63x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.