MFC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bank of Nova Scotia has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 19.35%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.41% beat Bank of Nova Scotia's return on equity of 9.52%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $46.64, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand Bank of Nova Scotia has an analysts' consensus of $67.94 which suggests that it could grow by 4.6%. Given that Manulife Financial has higher upside potential than Bank of Nova Scotia, analysts believe Manulife Financial is more attractive than Bank of Nova Scotia.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of Nova Scotia has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.256%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Bank of Nova Scotia offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Nova Scotia pays out 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than Bank of Nova Scotia quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.9B is higher than Bank of Nova Scotia's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.62x while Bank of Nova Scotia's PE ratio is 13.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.63x versus 2.82x for Bank of Nova Scotia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great-West Lifeco has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 8.37%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.41% beat Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 12.17%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $46.64, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand Great-West Lifeco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.12%. Given that Manulife Financial has higher upside potential than Great-West Lifeco, analysts believe Manulife Financial is more attractive than Great-West Lifeco.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.391%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Great-West Lifeco offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Great-West Lifeco pays out 72.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than Great-West Lifeco quarterly revenues of $10.6B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.9B is higher than Great-West Lifeco's net income of $891M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.62x while Great-West Lifeco's PE ratio is 12.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.63x versus 1.31x for Great-West Lifeco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iA Financial has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 4.91%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.41% beat iA Financial's return on equity of 13.82%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $46.64, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand iA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $136.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.63%. Given that Manulife Financial has higher upside potential than iA Financial, analysts believe Manulife Financial is more attractive than iA Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iA Financial has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.995%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. iA Financial offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. iA Financial pays out 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than iA Financial quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.9B is higher than iA Financial's net income of $288M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.62x while iA Financial's PE ratio is 13.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.63x versus 0.80x for iA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Life Financial has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 11.15%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.41% beat Sun Life Financial's return on equity of 15.64%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $46.64, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand Sun Life Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.34%. Given that Manulife Financial has higher upside potential than Sun Life Financial, analysts believe Manulife Financial is more attractive than Sun Life Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Life Financial has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.536%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Sun Life Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Life Financial pays out 56.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than Sun Life Financial quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.9B is higher than Sun Life Financial's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.62x while Sun Life Financial's PE ratio is 13.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.63x versus 0.98x for Sun Life Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.