ROK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nuburu has a net margin of 12.59% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -25746.56%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.11% beat Nuburu's return on equity of --.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $317.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.33%. On the other hand Nuburu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rockwell Automation has higher upside potential than Nuburu, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than Nuburu.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Nuburu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Nuburu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Nuburu quarterly revenues of $49.3K. Rockwell Automation's net income of $252M is higher than Nuburu's net income of -$14M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.48x while Nuburu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 4.59x versus 0.44x for Nuburu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 12.59% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of 3.16%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.11% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $317.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.33%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $450.69 which suggests that it could fall by -7.45%. Given that GE Vernova has more downside risk than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. Rockwell Automation's net income of $252M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.48x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 70.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 4.59x versus 3.79x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 12.59% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -814.55%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.11% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $317.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.33%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rockwell Automation has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.701%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Rockwell Automation's net income of $252M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.48x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 4.59x versus 8.16x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 12.59% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -7.32%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.11% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $317.12, signalling downside risk potential of -1.33%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 247.05%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.374%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $252M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.48x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 4.59x versus 0.30x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.