MA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 3.23%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $624.44, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $303.45 which suggests that it could fall by -22.98%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are larger than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.78x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 73.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.54x versus 15.32x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Circle Internet Group has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 11.2%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Circle Internet Group's return on equity of --.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $624.44, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Circle Internet Group has an analysts' consensus of $196.52 which suggests that it could fall by -4%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Circle Internet Group, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Circle Internet Group.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Circle Internet Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Circle Internet Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Circle Internet Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are larger than Circle Internet Group quarterly revenues of $578.6M. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Circle Internet Group's net income of $64.8M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.78x while Circle Internet Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.54x versus 38.04x for Circle Internet Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 16.52%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $624.44, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $82.02 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.557%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.78x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 15.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.54x versus 2.28x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 47.71%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.81%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $624.44, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $383.86 which suggests that it could grow by 9.93%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.368% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.716%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Visa offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Visa's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.78x while Visa's PE ratio is 34.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.54x versus 18.47x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.