CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PACCAR has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 6.79%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $350.36, signalling upside risk potential of 7.58%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $101.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.1%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than PACCAR.

Cummins has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.795% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.998%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.33x versus 1.54x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REV Group has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 3.02%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat REV Group's return on equity of 24.27%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $350.36, signalling upside risk potential of 7.58%. On the other hand REV Group has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.58%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than REV Group.

Cummins has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.795% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REV Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.143%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. REV Group offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group pays out 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than REV Group quarterly revenues of $629.1M. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than REV Group's net income of $19M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while REV Group's PE ratio is 24.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.33x versus 1.02x for REV Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 12.34%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.66%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $350.36, signalling upside risk potential of 7.58%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $213.09 which suggests that it could grow by 3.76%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Cummins has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.795% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.387%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $322M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 32.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.33x versus 3.39x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 60.63%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -18.83%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $350.36, signalling upside risk potential of 7.58%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.45%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.795% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.614, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.353%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Wabash National offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $380.9M. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than Wabash National's net income of $230.9M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.33x versus 0.24x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.