AZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Best Buy has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 0.84%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Best Buy's return on equity of 30.63%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,835.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.38%. On the other hand Best Buy has an analysts' consensus of $87.21 which suggests that it could grow by 25.62%. Given that Best Buy has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Best Buy is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Best Buy has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.426%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Best Buy offers a yield of 5.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy pays out 87.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Best Buy quarterly revenues of $13.9B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than Best Buy's net income of $117M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.67x while Best Buy's PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 0.36x for Best Buy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chewy has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 0.7%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Chewy's return on equity of 92.42%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,835.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.38%. On the other hand Chewy has an analysts' consensus of $39.35 which suggests that it could grow by 2.92%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than Chewy, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than Chewy.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy has a beta of 1.693, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.33%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Chewy quarterly revenues of $3.2B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than Chewy's net income of $22.8M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.67x while Chewy's PE ratio is 42.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 1.39x for Chewy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 13.02%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,835.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.38%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,457.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.16%. Given that O'Reilly Automotive has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe O'Reilly Automotive is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.015%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.1B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $538.5M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.67x while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 33.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 4.70x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Petco Health and Wellness has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of -0.89%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Petco Health and Wellness's return on equity of -8.91%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,835.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.38%. On the other hand Petco Health and Wellness has an analysts' consensus of $3.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Petco Health and Wellness has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Petco Health and Wellness is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Petco Health and Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Petco Health and Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Petco Health and Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Petco Health and Wellness quarterly revenues of $1.6B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than Petco Health and Wellness's net income of -$13.8M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.67x while Petco Health and Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 0.14x for Petco Health and Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.