TCTZF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NetEase has a net margin of 29.76% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 32.78%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.31% beat NetEase's return on equity of 22.06%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NetEase has an analysts' consensus of $123.46 which suggests that it could grow by 19.36%. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 92.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetEase has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.359%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. NetEase offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase pays out 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24B, which are larger than NetEase quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.1B is higher than NetEase's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.80x while NetEase's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.87x versus 4.55x for NetEase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 29.76% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 26.24%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.31% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 10.49%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.46 which suggests that it could grow by 16.92%. Given that Tencent Music Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Tencent Music Entertainment Group is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 92.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.279%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out 22.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24B, which are larger than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.1B is higher than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $272M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.80x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 23.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.87x versus 5.57x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weibo has a net margin of 29.76% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 1.94%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.31% beat Weibo's return on equity of 8.6%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Weibo has an analysts' consensus of $11.31 which suggests that it could grow by 32.48%. Given that Weibo has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Weibo is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 92.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weibo has a beta of 0.004, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.554%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Weibo offers a yield of 9.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Weibo pays out 64.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24B, which are larger than Weibo quarterly revenues of $456.8M. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.1B is higher than Weibo's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.80x while Weibo's PE ratio is 7.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.87x versus 1.29x for Weibo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.