TCTZF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baidu has a net margin of 26.56% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 23.78%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 25.44% beat Baidu's return on equity of 9.32%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baidu has an analysts' consensus of $104.65 which suggests that it could grow by 20.39%. Given that Baidu has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Baidu is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.065, which suggesting that the stock is 93.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baidu has a beta of 0.332, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.81%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Baidu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Baidu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.7B, which are larger than Baidu quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $6.6B is higher than Baidu's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Baidu's PE ratio is 8.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.90x versus 1.63x for Baidu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 26.56% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 58.33%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 25.44% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 14.19%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $19.05 which suggests that it could fall by -3.71%. Given that Tencent Music Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Tencent Music Entertainment Group is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.065, which suggesting that the stock is 93.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.386%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out 22.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.7B, which are larger than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $6.6B is higher than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $589.8M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 23.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.90x versus 7.68x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weibo has a net margin of 26.56% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 26.95%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 25.44% beat Weibo's return on equity of 10.25%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Weibo has an analysts' consensus of $11.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.58%. Given that Weibo has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Weibo is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.065, which suggesting that the stock is 93.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weibo has a beta of 0.110, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.032%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Weibo offers a yield of 8.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Weibo pays out 64.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.7B, which are larger than Weibo quarterly revenues of $396.9M. Tencent Holdings's net income of $6.6B is higher than Weibo's net income of $107M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Weibo's PE ratio is 7.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.90x versus 1.47x for Weibo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.