SODE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Correlate Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Social Detention's net margin of -50.54%. Social Detention's return on equity of -- beat Correlate Energy's return on equity of --.

Social Detention has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Correlate Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Social Detention has higher upside potential than Correlate Energy, analysts believe Social Detention is more attractive than Correlate Energy.

Social Detention has a beta of 2.092, which suggesting that the stock is 109.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Correlate Energy has a beta of -0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 194.65%.

Social Detention has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Correlate Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Social Detention pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Correlate Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Social Detention quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Correlate Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Social Detention's net income of -- is lower than Correlate Energy's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Social Detention's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Correlate Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Social Detention is -- versus 0.20x for Correlate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digital Locations has a net margin of -- compared to Social Detention's net margin of --. Social Detention's return on equity of -- beat Digital Locations's return on equity of --.

Social Detention has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Digital Locations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 67999900%. Given that Digital Locations has higher upside potential than Social Detention, analysts believe Digital Locations is more attractive than Social Detention.

Social Detention has a beta of 2.092, which suggesting that the stock is 109.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Locations has a beta of 2.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.747%.

Social Detention has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digital Locations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Social Detention pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Locations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Social Detention quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Digital Locations quarterly revenues of --. Social Detention's net income of -- is lower than Digital Locations's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Social Detention's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digital Locations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Social Detention is -- versus 51.08x for Digital Locations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ParkVida Group has a net margin of -- compared to Social Detention's net margin of --. Social Detention's return on equity of -- beat ParkVida Group's return on equity of --.

Social Detention has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ParkVida Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Social Detention has higher upside potential than ParkVida Group, analysts believe Social Detention is more attractive than ParkVida Group.

Social Detention has a beta of 2.092, which suggesting that the stock is 109.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParkVida Group has a beta of -0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.056%.

Social Detention has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ParkVida Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Social Detention pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ParkVida Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Social Detention quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ParkVida Group quarterly revenues of --. Social Detention's net income of -- is lower than ParkVida Group's net income of --. Notably, Social Detention's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ParkVida Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Social Detention is -- versus -- for ParkVida Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovate has a net margin of -- compared to Social Detention's net margin of -6.19%. Social Detention's return on equity of -- beat Innovate's return on equity of --.

Social Detention has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 849.67%. Given that Innovate has higher upside potential than Social Detention, analysts believe Innovate is more attractive than Social Detention.

Social Detention has a beta of 2.092, which suggesting that the stock is 109.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovate has a beta of 2.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.61%.

Social Detention has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Social Detention pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovate pays out -6.25% of its earnings as a dividend.

Social Detention quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovate quarterly revenues of $242.2M. Social Detention's net income of -- is lower than Innovate's net income of -$15M. Notably, Social Detention's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Social Detention is -- versus 0.05x for Innovate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.