PEFDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Davis Commodities has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 12.9% beat Davis Commodities's return on equity of 4.72%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Davis Commodities has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Delfi has higher upside potential than Davis Commodities, analysts believe Delfi is more attractive than Davis Commodities.

Delfi has a beta of 0.036, which suggesting that the stock is 96.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Davis Commodities has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Davis Commodities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Delfi pays 78.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Davis Commodities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delfi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Davis Commodities quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Davis Commodities's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.58x while Davis Commodities's PE ratio is 70.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.65x versus 0.18x for Davis Commodities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 12.9% beat First Resources's return on equity of 17.37%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Delfi has higher upside potential than First Resources, analysts believe Delfi is more attractive than First Resources.

Delfi has a beta of 0.036, which suggesting that the stock is 96.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. First Resources offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.83 per share. Delfi pays 78.19% of its earnings as a dividend. First Resources pays out 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Resources quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than First Resources's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.58x while First Resources's PE ratio is 6.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.65x versus 1.63x for First Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genius Group has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 12.9% beat Genius Group's return on equity of -15.41%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genius Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.30 which suggests that it could grow by 172.15%. Given that Genius Group has higher upside potential than Delfi, analysts believe Genius Group is more attractive than Delfi.

Delfi has a beta of 0.036, which suggesting that the stock is 96.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genius Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Genius Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Delfi pays 78.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Genius Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delfi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Genius Group quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Genius Group's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.58x while Genius Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.65x versus 7.53x for Genius Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wilmar International has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 12.9% beat Wilmar International's return on equity of 5.21%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wilmar International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Delfi has higher upside potential than Wilmar International, analysts believe Delfi is more attractive than Wilmar International.

Delfi has a beta of 0.036, which suggesting that the stock is 96.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wilmar International has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.608%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Wilmar International offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Delfi pays 78.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Wilmar International pays out 68.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wilmar International quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Wilmar International's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.58x while Wilmar International's PE ratio is 12.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.65x versus 0.21x for Wilmar International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.