MBFJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 38.98% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net margin of 29.31%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.01%.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.599%.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues are $12.1B, which are larger than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B is higher than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is 3.11x versus 2.73x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 38.98% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net margin of 22.58%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95%.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.98%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues are $12.1B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M. Notably, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 9.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is 3.11x versus 1.72x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 38.98% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net margin of 31.35%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.05%. Given that Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, analysts believe Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is more attractive than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.144%.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues are $12.1B, which are larger than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B is higher than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is 3.11x versus 3.06x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.