LMGHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Otello Corp ASA has a net margin of 1.25% compared to LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net margin of --. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's return on equity of 6.81% beat Otello Corp ASA's return on equity of --.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Otello Corp ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Otello Corp ASA, analysts believe LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA is more attractive than Otello Corp ASA.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otello Corp ASA has a beta of -3,359.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 336096.874%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Otello Corp ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otello Corp ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are larger than Otello Corp ASA quarterly revenues of --. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net income of $1.9M is higher than Otello Corp ASA's net income of --. Notably, LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while Otello Corp ASA's PE ratio is 8.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA is 1.01x versus 256.64x for Otello Corp ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opera has a net margin of 1.25% compared to LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net margin of 14.56%. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's return on equity of 6.81% beat Opera's return on equity of 17.82%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Opera has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.74%. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opera has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.498%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opera offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opera pays out 15.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Opera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are larger than Opera quarterly revenues of $123.2M. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net income of $1.9M is lower than Opera's net income of $17.9M. Notably, LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while Opera's PE ratio is 9.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA is 1.01x versus 3.84x for Opera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schibsted ASA has a net margin of 1.25% compared to LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net margin of -32.6%. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's return on equity of 6.81% beat Schibsted ASA's return on equity of 32.35%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schibsted ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Schibsted ASA, analysts believe LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA is more attractive than Schibsted ASA.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schibsted ASA has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.475%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schibsted ASA offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schibsted ASA pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Schibsted ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are smaller than Schibsted ASA quarterly revenues of $242.5M. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net income of $1.9M is lower than Schibsted ASA's net income of $475M. Notably, LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while Schibsted ASA's PE ratio is 5.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA is 1.01x versus 4.15x for Schibsted ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telenor ASA has a net margin of 1.25% compared to LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net margin of 16.33%. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's return on equity of 6.81% beat Telenor ASA's return on equity of 12.89%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Telenor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $13.10 which suggests that it could grow by 21.9%. Given that Telenor ASA has higher upside potential than LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA, analysts believe Telenor ASA is more attractive than LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telenor ASA has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.859%.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Telenor ASA offers a yield of 8.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Telenor ASA pays out 94.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Telenor ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are smaller than Telenor ASA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's net income of $1.9M is lower than Telenor ASA's net income of $304.6M. Notably, LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while Telenor ASA's PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA is 1.01x versus 1.98x for Telenor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.