LLLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of -- compared to Lamperd Less Lethal's net margin of -82.25%. Lamperd Less Lethal's return on equity of -- beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9905767.09%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Lamperd Less Lethal, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Lamperd Less Lethal.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a beta of -0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamperd Less Lethal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lamperd Less Lethal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Lamperd Less Lethal's net income of -- is lower than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Lamperd Less Lethal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamperd Less Lethal is -- versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Horizon Aircraft has a net margin of -- compared to Lamperd Less Lethal's net margin of --. Lamperd Less Lethal's return on equity of -- beat New Horizon Aircraft's return on equity of --.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Horizon Aircraft has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 174.77%. Given that New Horizon Aircraft has higher upside potential than Lamperd Less Lethal, analysts believe New Horizon Aircraft is more attractive than Lamperd Less Lethal.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a beta of -0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Horizon Aircraft has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Horizon Aircraft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamperd Less Lethal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Horizon Aircraft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lamperd Less Lethal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New Horizon Aircraft quarterly revenues of --. Lamperd Less Lethal's net income of -- is lower than New Horizon Aircraft's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Lamperd Less Lethal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Horizon Aircraft's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamperd Less Lethal is -- versus -- for New Horizon Aircraft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Lamperd Less Lethal's net margin of -3794.19%. Lamperd Less Lethal's return on equity of -- beat Loop Energy's return on equity of -208.62%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Loop Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lamperd Less Lethal has higher upside potential than Loop Energy, analysts believe Lamperd Less Lethal is more attractive than Loop Energy.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a beta of -0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loop Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamperd Less Lethal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lamperd Less Lethal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Loop Energy quarterly revenues of $89K. Lamperd Less Lethal's net income of -- is lower than Loop Energy's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Lamperd Less Lethal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamperd Less Lethal is -- versus 2.81x for Loop Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of -- compared to Lamperd Less Lethal's net margin of 3.19%. Lamperd Less Lethal's return on equity of -- beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.8%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Lamperd Less Lethal, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Lamperd Less Lethal.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a beta of -0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.632%.

Lamperd Less Lethal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lamperd Less Lethal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamperd Less Lethal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $129.7M. Lamperd Less Lethal's net income of -- is lower than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M. Notably, Lamperd Less Lethal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamperd Less Lethal is -- versus 0.88x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.