IVSBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EQT AB has a net margin of 48.43% compared to Investor AB's net margin of --. Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38% beat EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45%.

Investor AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EQT AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Investor AB has higher upside potential than EQT AB, analysts believe Investor AB is more attractive than EQT AB.

Investor AB has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 13.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EQT AB has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.805%.

Investor AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. EQT AB offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Investor AB pays 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT AB pays out 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT AB's is not.

Investor AB quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than EQT AB quarterly revenues of --. Investor AB's net income of $1.2B is higher than EQT AB's net income of --. Notably, Investor AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while EQT AB's PE ratio is 111.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Investor AB is 3.29x versus 14.80x for EQT AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a net margin of 48.43% compared to Investor AB's net margin of 31.11%. Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38% beat L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83%.

Investor AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand L E Lundbergforetagen AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Investor AB has higher upside potential than L E Lundbergforetagen AB, analysts believe Investor AB is more attractive than L E Lundbergforetagen AB.

Investor AB has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 13.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Investor AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Investor AB pays 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays out 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Investor AB quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues of $664.3M. Investor AB's net income of $1.2B is higher than L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M. Notably, Investor AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while L E Lundbergforetagen AB's PE ratio is 14.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Investor AB is 3.29x versus 4.46x for L E Lundbergforetagen AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VEF AB has a net margin of 48.43% compared to Investor AB's net margin of 89.8%. Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38% beat VEF AB's return on equity of 11.63%.

Investor AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEF AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Investor AB has higher upside potential than VEF AB, analysts believe Investor AB is more attractive than VEF AB.

Investor AB has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 13.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEF AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Investor AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. VEF AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Investor AB pays 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. VEF AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Investor AB quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than VEF AB quarterly revenues of $42.6M. Investor AB's net income of $1.2B is higher than VEF AB's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Investor AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while VEF AB's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Investor AB is 3.29x versus -- for VEF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNV Global AB has a net margin of 48.43% compared to Investor AB's net margin of 99.11%. Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38% beat VNV Global AB's return on equity of -21.17%.

Investor AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNV Global AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Investor AB has higher upside potential than VNV Global AB, analysts believe Investor AB is more attractive than VNV Global AB.

Investor AB has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 13.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNV Global AB has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.281%.

Investor AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. VNV Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Investor AB pays 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. VNV Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Investor AB quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than VNV Global AB quarterly revenues of -$25.8M. Investor AB's net income of $1.2B is higher than VNV Global AB's net income of -$25.6M. Notably, Investor AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while VNV Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Investor AB is 3.29x versus -- for VNV Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.