
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
$36.7B | $0.34 | 1.6% | -14.63% | $11.93 |
Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
$0.11 | -- | $5.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
$0.60 | -- | $5.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.49x |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
$0.0340 | -- | $1.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
$0.97 | -- | $6.8M | 4.04x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
$11.51 | $11.93 | $10B | -- | $0.25 | 8.69% | 0.06x |
Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
-103.33% | 0.030 | 119.33% | 0.32x |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
-52.73% | -0.570 | 285.26% | 0.04x |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
-- | 2.631 | -- | -- |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
-- | -0.359 | -- | 2.97x |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
50.63% | -0.434 | 74.63% | 0.29x |
Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
$3.8M | $137.7K | -- | -- | 1.49% | $153.8K |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
$2.4M | -$1.8M | -- | -- | -58% | -- |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
$2.7M | -$683K | 12.24% | 12.24% | -9.33% | -$654K |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
$6.5B | $13M | -33.02% | -58.91% | 0.13% | $336M |
Blum Holdings has a net margin of 0.82% compared to HealthWarehouse.com's net margin of -76.63%. HealthWarehouse.com's return on equity of -- beat Blum Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
42% | -$0.00 | -$2.1M |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
56.1% | -$0.40 | -$18.3M |
HealthWarehouse.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 519.05%. On the other hand Blum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HealthWarehouse.com has higher upside potential than Blum Holdings, analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com is more attractive than Blum Holdings.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
HealthWarehouse.com has a beta of 0.238, which suggesting that the stock is 76.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blum Holdings has a beta of 2.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.15%.
HealthWarehouse.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthWarehouse.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
HealthWarehouse.com quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than Blum Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.4M. HealthWarehouse.com's net income of $73.8K is higher than Blum Holdings's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, HealthWarehouse.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthWarehouse.com is 0.18x versus 0.49x for Blum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0.18x | -- | $9M | $73.8K |
BLMH
Blum Holdings
|
0.49x | -- | $4.4M | -$3.3M |
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings has a net margin of 0.82% compared to HealthWarehouse.com's net margin of --. HealthWarehouse.com's return on equity of -- beat CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
42% | -$0.00 | -$2.1M |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- |
HealthWarehouse.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 519.05%. On the other hand CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HealthWarehouse.com has higher upside potential than CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings, analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com is more attractive than CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
HealthWarehouse.com has a beta of 0.238, which suggesting that the stock is 76.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.482%.
HealthWarehouse.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthWarehouse.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
HealthWarehouse.com quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings quarterly revenues of --. HealthWarehouse.com's net income of $73.8K is higher than CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings's net income of --. Notably, HealthWarehouse.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthWarehouse.com is 0.18x versus -- for CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0.18x | -- | $9M | $73.8K |
CTTH
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Synergy CHC has a net margin of 0.82% compared to HealthWarehouse.com's net margin of --. HealthWarehouse.com's return on equity of -- beat Synergy CHC's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
42% | -$0.00 | -$2.1M |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
-- | -- | -- |
HealthWarehouse.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 519.05%. On the other hand Synergy CHC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HealthWarehouse.com has higher upside potential than Synergy CHC, analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com is more attractive than Synergy CHC.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
HealthWarehouse.com has a beta of 0.238, which suggesting that the stock is 76.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synergy CHC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
HealthWarehouse.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synergy CHC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthWarehouse.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synergy CHC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
HealthWarehouse.com quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than Synergy CHC quarterly revenues of --. HealthWarehouse.com's net income of $73.8K is higher than Synergy CHC's net income of --. Notably, HealthWarehouse.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synergy CHC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthWarehouse.com is 0.18x versus -- for Synergy CHC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0.18x | -- | $9M | $73.8K |
SNYR
Synergy CHC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
SunLink Health Systems has a net margin of 0.82% compared to HealthWarehouse.com's net margin of -9.16%. HealthWarehouse.com's return on equity of -- beat SunLink Health Systems's return on equity of 12.24%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
42% | -$0.00 | -$2.1M |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
37.14% | -$0.10 | $13.4M |
HealthWarehouse.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 519.05%. On the other hand SunLink Health Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HealthWarehouse.com has higher upside potential than SunLink Health Systems, analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com is more attractive than SunLink Health Systems.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
HealthWarehouse.com has a beta of 0.238, which suggesting that the stock is 76.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SunLink Health Systems has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.867%.
HealthWarehouse.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SunLink Health Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthWarehouse.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SunLink Health Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
HealthWarehouse.com quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than SunLink Health Systems quarterly revenues of $7.3M. HealthWarehouse.com's net income of $73.8K is higher than SunLink Health Systems's net income of -$671K. Notably, HealthWarehouse.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SunLink Health Systems's PE ratio is 4.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthWarehouse.com is 0.18x versus 0.22x for SunLink Health Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0.18x | -- | $9M | $73.8K |
SSY
SunLink Health Systems
|
0.22x | 4.04x | $7.3M | -$671K |
Walgreens Boots Alliance has a net margin of 0.82% compared to HealthWarehouse.com's net margin of -0.45%. HealthWarehouse.com's return on equity of -- beat Walgreens Boots Alliance's return on equity of -58.91%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
42% | -$0.00 | -$2.1M |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
16.69% | -$0.20 | $14.7B |
HealthWarehouse.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 519.05%. On the other hand Walgreens Boots Alliance has an analysts' consensus of $11.93 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that HealthWarehouse.com has higher upside potential than Walgreens Boots Alliance, analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com is more attractive than Walgreens Boots Alliance.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
1 | 12 | 0 |
HealthWarehouse.com has a beta of 0.238, which suggesting that the stock is 76.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walgreens Boots Alliance has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.237%.
HealthWarehouse.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Walgreens Boots Alliance offers a yield of 8.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. HealthWarehouse.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walgreens Boots Alliance pays out -14.59% of its earnings as a dividend.
HealthWarehouse.com quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Walgreens Boots Alliance quarterly revenues of $39B. HealthWarehouse.com's net income of $73.8K is higher than Walgreens Boots Alliance's net income of -$175M. Notably, HealthWarehouse.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Walgreens Boots Alliance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthWarehouse.com is 0.18x versus 0.06x for Walgreens Boots Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
HEWA
HealthWarehouse.com
|
0.18x | -- | $9M | $73.8K |
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance
|
0.06x | -- | $39B | -$175M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…
If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is down 3.26% over the past day.
Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 8.6% over the past day.
Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 2.98% over the past day.