GUDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Domino's Pizza Enterprises has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 8.81% beat Domino's Pizza Enterprises's return on equity of 2.68%.

Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Domino's Pizza Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amotiv has higher upside potential than Domino's Pizza Enterprises, analysts believe Amotiv is more attractive than Domino's Pizza Enterprises.

Amotiv has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Domino's Pizza Enterprises has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.598%.

Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Domino's Pizza Enterprises offers a yield of 5.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Domino's Pizza Enterprises pays out 57.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Domino's Pizza Enterprises quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Domino's Pizza Enterprises's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Domino's Pizza Enterprises's PE ratio is 105.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.24x versus 0.75x for Domino's Pizza Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fitell has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 8.81% beat Fitell's return on equity of -110.03%.

Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fitell has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amotiv has higher upside potential than Fitell, analysts believe Amotiv is more attractive than Fitell.

Amotiv has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fitell has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Fitell offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Fitell pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fitell quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Fitell's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Fitell's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.24x versus 2.66x for Fitell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mixed Martial Arts Group has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 8.81% beat Mixed Martial Arts Group's return on equity of --.

Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mixed Martial Arts Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 459.55%. Given that Mixed Martial Arts Group has higher upside potential than Amotiv, analysts believe Mixed Martial Arts Group is more attractive than Amotiv.

Amotiv has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mixed Martial Arts Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Mixed Martial Arts Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Mixed Martial Arts Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mixed Martial Arts Group quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Mixed Martial Arts Group's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Mixed Martial Arts Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.24x versus -- for Mixed Martial Arts Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesfarmers has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 8.81% beat Wesfarmers's return on equity of 33.64%.

Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wesfarmers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amotiv has higher upside potential than Wesfarmers, analysts believe Amotiv is more attractive than Wesfarmers.

Amotiv has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.661%.

Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Wesfarmers offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wesfarmers quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Wesfarmers's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Wesfarmers's PE ratio is 37.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.24x versus 2.09x for Wesfarmers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.