FRTAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Stroeer SE & Co KGaA has a net margin of 9.5% compared to freenet AG's net margin of 1.8%. freenet AG's return on equity of 16.14% beat Stroeer SE & Co KGaA's return on equity of 30.93%.

freenet AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stroeer SE & Co KGaA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that freenet AG has higher upside potential than Stroeer SE & Co KGaA, analysts believe freenet AG is more attractive than Stroeer SE & Co KGaA.

freenet AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stroeer SE & Co KGaA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

freenet AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.08%. Stroeer SE & Co KGaA offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.63 per share. freenet AG pays 85.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Stroeer SE & Co KGaA pays out 93.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

freenet AG quarterly revenues are $636M, which are larger than Stroeer SE & Co KGaA quarterly revenues of $500.3M. freenet AG's net income of $60.4M is higher than Stroeer SE & Co KGaA's net income of $9M. Notably, freenet AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while Stroeer SE & Co KGaA's PE ratio is 22.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for freenet AG is 1.61x versus 1.52x for Stroeer SE & Co KGaA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG has a net margin of 9.5% compared to freenet AG's net margin of --. freenet AG's return on equity of 16.14% beat Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG's return on equity of --.

freenet AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that freenet AG has higher upside potential than Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG, analysts believe freenet AG is more attractive than Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG.

freenet AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.674%.

freenet AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.08%. Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG offers a yield of 8.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. freenet AG pays 85.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG pays out 159.23% of its earnings as a dividend. freenet AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG's is not.

freenet AG quarterly revenues are $636M, which are larger than Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. freenet AG's net income of $60.4M is higher than Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, freenet AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for freenet AG is 1.61x versus 0.84x for Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

trivago NV has a net margin of 9.5% compared to freenet AG's net margin of -6.28%. freenet AG's return on equity of 16.14% beat trivago NV's return on equity of -11.76%.

freenet AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand trivago NV has an analysts' consensus of $4.80 which suggests that it could grow by 11.25%. Given that trivago NV has higher upside potential than freenet AG, analysts believe trivago NV is more attractive than freenet AG.

freenet AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison trivago NV has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.215%.

freenet AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.08%. trivago NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share. freenet AG pays 85.25% of its earnings as a dividend. trivago NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. freenet AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

freenet AG quarterly revenues are $636M, which are larger than trivago NV quarterly revenues of $130.6M. freenet AG's net income of $60.4M is higher than trivago NV's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, freenet AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while trivago NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for freenet AG is 1.61x versus 0.58x for trivago NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Internet AG has a net margin of 9.5% compared to freenet AG's net margin of --. freenet AG's return on equity of 16.14% beat United Internet AG's return on equity of --.

freenet AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Internet AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that freenet AG has higher upside potential than United Internet AG, analysts believe freenet AG is more attractive than United Internet AG.

freenet AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Internet AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

freenet AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.08%. United Internet AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. freenet AG pays 85.25% of its earnings as a dividend. United Internet AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. freenet AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

freenet AG quarterly revenues are $636M, which are larger than United Internet AG quarterly revenues of --. freenet AG's net income of $60.4M is higher than United Internet AG's net income of --. Notably, freenet AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while United Internet AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for freenet AG is 1.61x versus -- for United Internet AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.