Financhill
Buy
55

DQJCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$32.73
Seasonality move :
4.55%
Day range:
$31.90 - $34.19
52-week range:
$20.00 - $34.19
Dividend yield:
0.71%
P/E ratio:
35.05x
P/S ratio:
1.41x
P/B ratio:
4.98x
Volume:
25.2K
Avg. volume:
44.1K
1-year change:
28.37%
Market cap:
$19.9B
Revenue:
$14.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.95

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
DQJCY
Pan Pacific International Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
ASBRF
Asahi Group Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
CCOJY
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
KNBWY
Kirin Holdings
$3.8B -- 9.54% -- $16.60
SOOBF
Sapporo Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
TKHIF
Takara Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
DQJCY
Pan Pacific International Holdings
$33.39 -- $19.9B 35.05x $0.06 0.71% 1.41x
ASBRF
Asahi Group Holdings
$13.44 -- $20.2B 24.03x $0.17 2.29% 1.12x
CCOJY
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
$8.25 -- $2.9B 51.87x $0.09 2.16% 0.55x
KNBWY
Kirin Holdings
$14.42 $16.60 $11.7B 16.00x $0.24 3.34% 0.79x
SOOBF
Sapporo Holdings
$42.10 -- $3.3B 66.94x $0.33 0.78% 0.98x
TKHIF
Takara Holdings
$7.10 -- $1.4B 12.86x $0.21 0% 0.58x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
DQJCY
Pan Pacific International Holdings
42.13% -0.189 17.66% 0.60x
ASBRF
Asahi Group Holdings
37.18% -1.449 51.87% 0.32x
CCOJY
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
20.39% -0.018 27.3% 1.18x
KNBWY
Kirin Holdings
48.35% -0.591 52.54% 0.66x
SOOBF
Sapporo Holdings
52.97% -0.021 42.18% 0.52x
TKHIF
Takara Holdings
19.13% 0.000 22.05% 2.03x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
DQJCY
Pan Pacific International Holdings
$1.1B $255.3M 8.39% 15.55% 6.58% -$51.9M
ASBRF
Asahi Group Holdings
$1.5B $222.6M 3.15% 5% 6.52% -$1.2B
CCOJY
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
$544.9M -$66.3M -1.44% -1.9% -5.25% -$53.6M
KNBWY
Kirin Holdings
$1.7B $203.3M 4.91% 7.57% 7.58% -$175.2M
SOOBF
Sapporo Holdings
$226.6M -$14.6M 1.79% 3.92% -1.76% $9.6M
TKHIF
Takara Holdings
$188.7M $28.7M 4.55% 5.45% 6.55% --

Pan Pacific International Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns DQJCY or ASBRF?

    Asahi Group Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 3.41%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.55% beat Asahi Group Holdings's return on equity of 5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    31.24% $0.24 $7B
    ASBRF
    Asahi Group Holdings
    35.37% $0.09 $27.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About DQJCY or ASBRF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Asahi Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Asahi Group Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Asahi Group Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    0 0 0
    ASBRF
    Asahi Group Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is DQJCY or ASBRF More Risky?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asahi Group Holdings has a beta of 0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.904%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DQJCY or ASBRF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Asahi Group Holdings offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Asahi Group Holdings pays out 34.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DQJCY or ASBRF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Asahi Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $143.6M is higher than Asahi Group Holdings's net income of $141.1M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Asahi Group Holdings's PE ratio is 24.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.41x versus 1.12x for Asahi Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    1.41x 35.05x $3.7B $143.6M
    ASBRF
    Asahi Group Holdings
    1.12x 24.03x $4.1B $141.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns DQJCY or CCOJY?

    Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of -3.4%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.55% beat Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's return on equity of -1.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    31.24% $0.24 $7B
    CCOJY
    Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
    43.79% -$0.12 $3.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About DQJCY or CCOJY?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    0 0 0
    CCOJY
    Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is DQJCY or CCOJY More Risky?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.449%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DQJCY or CCOJY?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings pays out 122.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Pan Pacific International Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DQJCY or CCOJY?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $143.6M is higher than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's net income of -$42.3M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's PE ratio is 51.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.41x versus 0.55x for Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    1.41x 35.05x $3.7B $143.6M
    CCOJY
    Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings
    0.55x 51.87x $1.2B -$42.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns DQJCY or KNBWY?

    Kirin Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 4.46%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.55% beat Kirin Holdings's return on equity of 7.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    31.24% $0.24 $7B
    KNBWY
    Kirin Holdings
    46.46% $0.20 $16.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About DQJCY or KNBWY?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirin Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.12%. Given that Kirin Holdings has higher upside potential than Pan Pacific International Holdings, analysts believe Kirin Holdings is more attractive than Pan Pacific International Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    0 0 0
    KNBWY
    Kirin Holdings
    0 1 0
  • Is DQJCY or KNBWY More Risky?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirin Holdings has a beta of 0.115, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.452%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DQJCY or KNBWY?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Kirin Holdings offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirin Holdings pays out 100.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Pan Pacific International Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kirin Holdings's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DQJCY or KNBWY?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kirin Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $143.6M is lower than Kirin Holdings's net income of $159.6M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Kirin Holdings's PE ratio is 16.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.41x versus 0.79x for Kirin Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    1.41x 35.05x $3.7B $143.6M
    KNBWY
    Kirin Holdings
    0.79x 16.00x $3.6B $159.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns DQJCY or SOOBF?

    Sapporo Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of -3.56%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.55% beat Sapporo Holdings's return on equity of 3.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    31.24% $0.24 $7B
    SOOBF
    Sapporo Holdings
    29.11% -$0.36 $2.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About DQJCY or SOOBF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sapporo Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Sapporo Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Sapporo Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    0 0 0
    SOOBF
    Sapporo Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is DQJCY or SOOBF More Risky?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sapporo Holdings has a beta of 0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.552%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DQJCY or SOOBF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Sapporo Holdings offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Sapporo Holdings pays out 47.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DQJCY or SOOBF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Sapporo Holdings quarterly revenues of $778.3M. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $143.6M is higher than Sapporo Holdings's net income of -$27.7M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Sapporo Holdings's PE ratio is 66.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.41x versus 0.98x for Sapporo Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    1.41x 35.05x $3.7B $143.6M
    SOOBF
    Sapporo Holdings
    0.98x 66.94x $778.3M -$27.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns DQJCY or TKHIF?

    Takara Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 4.33%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.55% beat Takara Holdings's return on equity of 5.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    31.24% $0.24 $7B
    TKHIF
    Takara Holdings
    31.84% $0.13 $2.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About DQJCY or TKHIF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Takara Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Takara Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Takara Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    0 0 0
    TKHIF
    Takara Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is DQJCY or TKHIF More Risky?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Takara Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DQJCY or TKHIF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Takara Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Takara Holdings pays out 34.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DQJCY or TKHIF?

    Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Takara Holdings quarterly revenues of $592.6M. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $143.6M is higher than Takara Holdings's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Takara Holdings's PE ratio is 12.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.41x versus 0.58x for Takara Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DQJCY
    Pan Pacific International Holdings
    1.41x 35.05x $3.7B $143.6M
    TKHIF
    Takara Holdings
    0.58x 12.86x $592.6M $25.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is IONQ The Next NVIDIA?
Is IONQ The Next NVIDIA?

Quantum computing startup IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) has seen its stock skyrocket…

Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Best AI Index Fund to Buy

Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…

Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?

Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 47x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
84
VERA alert for Jun 3

Vera Therapeutics [VERA] is down 2.55% over the past day.

Buy
80
KYMR alert for Jun 3

Kymera Therapeutics [KYMR] is up 1.21% over the past day.

Buy
78
SBET alert for Jun 3

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 8.56% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock