CYJBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KONE Oyj has a net margin of 13.03% compared to Hiab's net margin of 7.96%. Hiab's return on equity of 83.64% beat KONE Oyj's return on equity of 39.65%.

Hiab has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KONE Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hiab has higher upside potential than KONE Oyj, analysts believe Hiab is more attractive than KONE Oyj.

Hiab has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KONE Oyj has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.842%.

Hiab has a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. KONE Oyj offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Hiab pays 12.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KONE Oyj pays out 95.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hiab quarterly revenues are $433M, which are smaller than KONE Oyj quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Hiab's net income of $56.4M is lower than KONE Oyj's net income of $223.7M. Notably, Hiab's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.96x while KONE Oyj's PE ratio is 32.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hiab is 1.51x versus 2.81x for KONE Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metso has a net margin of 13.03% compared to Hiab's net margin of 10.06%. Hiab's return on equity of 83.64% beat Metso's return on equity of 12.23%.

Hiab has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metso has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hiab has higher upside potential than Metso, analysts believe Hiab is more attractive than Metso.

Hiab has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metso has a beta of 1.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.131%.

Hiab has a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Metso offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Hiab pays 12.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Metso pays out 90.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hiab quarterly revenues are $433M, which are smaller than Metso quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hiab's net income of $56.4M is lower than Metso's net income of $124.2M. Notably, Hiab's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.96x while Metso's PE ratio is 30.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hiab is 1.51x versus 2.10x for Metso. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wartsila has a net margin of 13.03% compared to Hiab's net margin of 7.82%. Hiab's return on equity of 83.64% beat Wartsila's return on equity of 23.1%.

Hiab has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wartsila has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hiab has higher upside potential than Wartsila, analysts believe Hiab is more attractive than Wartsila.

Hiab has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wartsila has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.9%.

Hiab has a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Wartsila offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hiab pays 12.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Wartsila pays out 38.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hiab quarterly revenues are $433M, which are smaller than Wartsila quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Hiab's net income of $56.4M is lower than Wartsila's net income of $128.4M. Notably, Hiab's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.96x while Wartsila's PE ratio is 24.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hiab is 1.51x versus 1.99x for Wartsila. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

YIT Oyj has a net margin of 13.03% compared to Hiab's net margin of -2.33%. Hiab's return on equity of 83.64% beat YIT Oyj's return on equity of -12.98%.

Hiab has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand YIT Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hiab has higher upside potential than YIT Oyj, analysts believe Hiab is more attractive than YIT Oyj.

Hiab has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison YIT Oyj has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72%.

Hiab has a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. YIT Oyj offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hiab pays 12.99% of its earnings as a dividend. YIT Oyj pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hiab's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hiab quarterly revenues are $433M, which are larger than YIT Oyj quarterly revenues of $406.2M. Hiab's net income of $56.4M is higher than YIT Oyj's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Hiab's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.96x while YIT Oyj's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hiab is 1.51x versus 0.30x for YIT Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.