Financhill
Sell
45

CHFHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$6.70
Seasonality move :
-8.7%
Day range:
$6.70 - $6.70
52-week range:
$6.25 - $7.38
Dividend yield:
6.3%
P/E ratio:
7.83x
P/S ratio:
0.31x
P/B ratio:
1.06x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-9.21%
Market cap:
$937.1M
Revenue:
$3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.86

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CHFHY
China Foods
-- -- -- -- --
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
$1.7B -- 18.85% -- --
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
-- -- -- -- --
RAY
Raytech Holding
-- -- -- -- --
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CHFHY
China Foods
$6.70 -- $937.1M 7.83x $0.42 6.3% 0.31x
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
$1.08 -- $14.2B 15.96x $0.06 5.2% 2.27x
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
$7.05 -- $11.4B 16.38x $0.11 3% 2.08x
RAY
Raytech Holding
$1.94 -- $34.2M 33.32x $0.00 0% 1.84x
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
$0.14 -- $7.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.99x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CHFHY
China Foods
-- 0.120 -- 0.83x
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
1.96% -1.530 -- 0.86x
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
6.35% -0.892 2.56% 0.22x
RAY
Raytech Holding
-- -5.297 -- 1.89x
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
-- 1.270 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CHFHY
China Foods
-- -- 8.61% 8.61% -- --
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
$745M $331M 6.78% 6.93% 22.66% --
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
-- -- 12.39% 13.4% -- --
RAY
Raytech Holding
-- -- 37.42% 37.42% -- --
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
-- -- -- -- -- --

China Foods vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or BDWBF?

    Budweiser Brewing Co APAC has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of 16.02%. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's return on equity of 6.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    -- -- $1.4B
    BDWBF
    Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
    50.99% $0.02 $10.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or BDWBF?

    China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Budweiser Brewing Co APAC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0 0 0
    BDWBF
    Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
    0 0 0
  • Is CHFHY or BDWBF More Risky?

    China Foods has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Budweiser Brewing Co APAC has a beta of -0.149, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.884%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or BDWBF?

    China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. Budweiser Brewing Co APAC offers a yield of 5.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. China Foods pays 48.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Budweiser Brewing Co APAC pays out 96.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or BDWBF?

    China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC quarterly revenues of $1.5B. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's net income of $234M. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's PE ratio is 15.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 2.27x for Budweiser Brewing Co APAC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0.31x 7.83x -- --
    BDWBF
    Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
    2.27x 15.96x $1.5B $234M
  • Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or CRHKY?

    China Resources Beer (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings)'s return on equity of 13.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    -- -- $1.4B
    CRHKY
    China Resources Beer (Holdings)
    -- -- $5.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or CRHKY?

    China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings), analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0 0 0
    CRHKY
    China Resources Beer (Holdings)
    0 0 0
  • Is CHFHY or CRHKY More Risky?

    China Foods has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.122%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or CRHKY?

    China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. China Foods pays 48.11% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) pays out 70.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or CRHKY?

    China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while China Resources Beer (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 16.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 2.08x for China Resources Beer (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0.31x 7.83x -- --
    CRHKY
    China Resources Beer (Holdings)
    2.08x 16.38x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or RAY?

    Raytech Holding has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat Raytech Holding's return on equity of 37.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    -- -- $1.4B
    RAY
    Raytech Holding
    -- -- $4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or RAY?

    China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than Raytech Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0 0 0
    RAY
    Raytech Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is CHFHY or RAY More Risky?

    China Foods has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or RAY?

    China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. Raytech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Foods pays 48.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or RAY?

    China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding's net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while Raytech Holding's PE ratio is 33.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 1.84x for Raytech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0.31x 7.83x -- --
    RAY
    Raytech Holding
    1.84x 33.32x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or TWG?

    Top Wealth Group Holding has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat Top Wealth Group Holding's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    -- -- $1.4B
    TWG
    Top Wealth Group Holding
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or TWG?

    China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0 0 0
    TWG
    Top Wealth Group Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is CHFHY or TWG More Risky?

    China Foods has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or TWG?

    China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. Top Wealth Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Foods pays 48.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or TWG?

    China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while Top Wealth Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 0.99x for Top Wealth Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHFHY
    China Foods
    0.31x 7.83x -- --
    TWG
    Top Wealth Group Holding
    0.99x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Oklo Stock Double?
Will Oklo Stock Double?

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…

Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine
Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine

If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…

Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?
Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?

At roughly $89 a share, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) trades for barely…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Alerts

Buy
77
VBTX alert for Jul 15

Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is down 1.68% over the past day.

Buy
72
MNPR alert for Jul 15

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 3.5% over the past day.

Buy
56
NBIS alert for Jul 15

Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 3.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock