CGCLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nippon Steel has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of 5.47%. Central Glass's return on equity of 4.61% beat Nippon Steel's return on equity of 6.01%.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Steel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Nippon Steel, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Nippon Steel.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Steel has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.307%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Nippon Steel offers a yield of 5.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Central Glass pays 82.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Steel pays out 46.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Nippon Steel quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is lower than Nippon Steel's net income of $778.4M. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Nippon Steel's PE ratio is 9.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.54x versus 0.36x for Nippon Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oji Holdings has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of 5.66%. Central Glass's return on equity of 4.61% beat Oji Holdings's return on equity of 3.98%.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oji Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Oji Holdings, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Oji Holdings.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oji Holdings has a beta of -0.027, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.666%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Oji Holdings offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Central Glass pays 82.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oji Holdings pays out 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Oji Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is lower than Oji Holdings's net income of $170.9M. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Oji Holdings's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.54x versus 0.38x for Oji Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shin-Etsu Chemical has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of --. Central Glass's return on equity of 4.61% beat Shin-Etsu Chemical's return on equity of --.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shin-Etsu Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Shin-Etsu Chemical, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Shin-Etsu Chemical.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shin-Etsu Chemical has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.77%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Shin-Etsu Chemical offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Central Glass pays 82.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Central Glass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are larger than Shin-Etsu Chemical quarterly revenues of --. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is higher than Shin-Etsu Chemical's net income of --. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Shin-Etsu Chemical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.54x versus 5.32x for Shin-Etsu Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyobo has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of 0.58%. Central Glass's return on equity of 4.61% beat Toyobo's return on equity of 0.85%.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyobo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Toyobo, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Toyobo.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyobo has a beta of -0.083, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.302%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Toyobo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Central Glass pays 82.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyobo pays out 175.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Glass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Toyobo's is not.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Toyobo quarterly revenues of $688.8M. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is higher than Toyobo's net income of $4M. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Toyobo's PE ratio is 45.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.54x versus 0.22x for Toyobo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.