Financhill
Sell
40

BHPLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$25.30
Seasonality move :
0.02%
Day range:
$22.38 - $25.30
52-week range:
$19.04 - $32.00
Dividend yield:
4.9%
P/E ratio:
11.29x
P/S ratio:
2.40x
P/B ratio:
2.82x
Volume:
5.5K
Avg. volume:
474.4K
1-year change:
-10.9%
Market cap:
$128.4B
Revenue:
$55.7B
EPS (TTM):
$2.24

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BHPLF
BHP Group
-- -- -- -- --
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
-- -- -- -- --
IAUFF
AIC Mines
-- -- -- -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals
-- -- -- -- --
SMSMY
Sims
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BHPLF
BHP Group
$25.30 -- $128.4B 11.29x $0.50 4.9% 2.40x
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
$0.0370 -- $23.8M 0.76x $0.03 0% 0.11x
IAUFF
AIC Mines
$0.19 -- $109.4M 12.19x $0.00 0% 0.88x
NVA
Nova Minerals
$13.51 -- $70.7M -- $0.00 0% --
SMSMY
Sims
$10.10 -- $2B 36.02x $0.06 1.29% 0.44x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BHPLF
BHP Group
30.73% 1.014 15.9% 1.21x
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
-- -4.047 -- --
IAUFF
AIC Mines
10.79% -0.398 17.99% 2.38x
NVA
Nova Minerals
-- 0.000 -- --
SMSMY
Sims
17.81% 0.306 25.96% 0.94x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BHPLF
BHP Group
-- -- 16.7% 23.67% -- --
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
-- -- -- -- -- --
IAUFF
AIC Mines
-- -- 6.29% 6.71% -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals
-- -- -- -- -- --
SMSMY
Sims
-- -- -3.4% -4.33% -- --

BHP Group vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or GSMGF?

    Indiana Resources has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Indiana Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    -- -- $69.8B
    GSMGF
    Indiana Resources
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or GSMGF?

    BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Indiana Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Indiana Resources, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Indiana Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    0 0 0
    GSMGF
    Indiana Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is BHPLF or GSMGF More Risky?

    BHP Group has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.843% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indiana Resources has a beta of 4.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.423%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or GSMGF?

    BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Indiana Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Indiana Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or GSMGF?

    BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Indiana Resources quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Indiana Resources's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Indiana Resources's PE ratio is 0.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.40x versus 0.11x for Indiana Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    2.40x 11.29x -- --
    GSMGF
    Indiana Resources
    0.11x 0.76x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or IAUFF?

    AIC Mines has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    -- -- $69.8B
    IAUFF
    AIC Mines
    -- -- $159.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or IAUFF?

    BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AIC Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than AIC Mines.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    0 0 0
    IAUFF
    AIC Mines
    0 0 0
  • Is BHPLF or IAUFF More Risky?

    BHP Group has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.843% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AIC Mines has a beta of 0.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.904%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or IAUFF?

    BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. AIC Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. AIC Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or IAUFF?

    BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AIC Mines quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than AIC Mines's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while AIC Mines's PE ratio is 12.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.40x versus 0.88x for AIC Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    2.40x 11.29x -- --
    IAUFF
    AIC Mines
    0.88x 12.19x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or NVA?

    Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    -- -- $69.8B
    NVA
    Nova Minerals
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or NVA?

    BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 85.05%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than BHP Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    0 0 0
    NVA
    Nova Minerals
    0 0 0
  • Is BHPLF or NVA More Risky?

    BHP Group has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.843% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or NVA?

    BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or NVA?

    BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.40x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    2.40x 11.29x -- --
    NVA
    Nova Minerals
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or SMSMY?

    Sims has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Sims's return on equity of -4.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    -- -- $69.8B
    SMSMY
    Sims
    -- -- $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or SMSMY?

    BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sims has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Sims, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Sims.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    0 0 0
    SMSMY
    Sims
    0 0 0
  • Is BHPLF or SMSMY More Risky?

    BHP Group has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.843% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sims has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.599%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or SMSMY?

    BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Sims offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Sims pays out -70.24% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or SMSMY?

    BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sims quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Sims's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Sims's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.40x versus 0.44x for Sims. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHPLF
    BHP Group
    2.40x 11.29x -- --
    SMSMY
    Sims
    0.44x 36.02x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will VICI Properties Be in 5 Years?
Where Will VICI Properties Be in 5 Years?

VICI Properties (NYSE:VICI) is a real estate investment trust focused…

Where Will Exxon Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Exxon Stock Be in 5 Years?

For sure Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) is no hyped-up AI…

How High Will Dollar General Stock Go?
How High Will Dollar General Stock Go?

Shares of Dollar General (NYSE:DG) have risen significantly in recent…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
64
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
59
SBET alert for Jun 10

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 14.34% over the past day.

Buy
85
ASTS alert for Jun 10

AST SpaceMobile [ASTS] is up 2.58% over the past day.

Buy
69
CCJ alert for Jun 10

Cameco [CCJ] is down 4.56% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock