BFLBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG has a net margin of 2.49% compared to Bilfinger SE's net margin of 1.81%. Bilfinger SE's return on equity of 14.69% beat Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG's return on equity of 5.09%.

Bilfinger SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bilfinger SE has higher upside potential than Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG, analysts believe Bilfinger SE is more attractive than Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG.

Bilfinger SE has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.907%.

Bilfinger SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bilfinger SE pays 37.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG pays out 36.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bilfinger SE quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG quarterly revenues of $458.4M. Bilfinger SE's net income of $33.3M is higher than Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Bilfinger SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG's PE ratio is 30.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bilfinger SE is 0.61x versus 0.75x for Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has a net margin of 2.49% compared to Bilfinger SE's net margin of --. Bilfinger SE's return on equity of 14.69% beat KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's return on equity of 0.62%.

Bilfinger SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bilfinger SE has higher upside potential than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG, analysts believe Bilfinger SE is more attractive than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG.

Bilfinger SE has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.261%.

Bilfinger SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG offers a yield of 19.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Bilfinger SE pays 37.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG pays out 0.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bilfinger SE quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG quarterly revenues of --. Bilfinger SE's net income of $33.3M is higher than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's net income of --. Notably, Bilfinger SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's PE ratio is 8.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bilfinger SE is 0.61x versus 0.40x for KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schmid Group NV has a net margin of 2.49% compared to Bilfinger SE's net margin of --. Bilfinger SE's return on equity of 14.69% beat Schmid Group NV's return on equity of --.

Bilfinger SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schmid Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bilfinger SE has higher upside potential than Schmid Group NV, analysts believe Bilfinger SE is more attractive than Schmid Group NV.

Bilfinger SE has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schmid Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bilfinger SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Schmid Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bilfinger SE pays 37.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Schmid Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bilfinger SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bilfinger SE quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Schmid Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Bilfinger SE's net income of $33.3M is higher than Schmid Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Bilfinger SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while Schmid Group NV's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bilfinger SE is 0.61x versus 1.60x for Schmid Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siemens AG has a net margin of 2.49% compared to Bilfinger SE's net margin of 11.39%. Bilfinger SE's return on equity of 14.69% beat Siemens AG's return on equity of 16.85%.

Bilfinger SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siemens AG has an analysts' consensus of $127.64 which suggests that it could grow by 5.83%. Given that Siemens AG has higher upside potential than Bilfinger SE, analysts believe Siemens AG is more attractive than Bilfinger SE.

Bilfinger SE has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siemens AG has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.144%.

Bilfinger SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Siemens AG offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.72 per share. Bilfinger SE pays 37.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Siemens AG pays out 44.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bilfinger SE quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Siemens AG quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Bilfinger SE's net income of $33.3M is lower than Siemens AG's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Bilfinger SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while Siemens AG's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bilfinger SE is 0.61x versus 2.30x for Siemens AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.