ARKAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellium SE has a net margin of 4.93% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of 0.12%. Arkema SA's return on equity of 4.74% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.29%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $24.70 which suggests that it could grow by 75.55%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Arkema SA, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Arkema SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.972, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.244%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arkema SA pays 60.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Arkema SA's net income of $129.8M is higher than Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 14.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.55x versus 0.21x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Imerys has a net margin of 4.93% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of -33.33%. Arkema SA's return on equity of 4.74% beat Imerys's return on equity of 1.45%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.29%. On the other hand Imerys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Imerys, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Imerys.

Arkema SA has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imerys has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.157%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Imerys offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. Arkema SA pays 60.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Imerys pays out 643.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Imerys's is not.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Imerys quarterly revenues of $940.3M. Arkema SA's net income of $129.8M is higher than Imerys's net income of -$313.4M. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Imerys's PE ratio is 52.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.55x versus 0.61x for Imerys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robertet SA has a net margin of 4.93% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of --. Arkema SA's return on equity of 4.74% beat Robertet SA's return on equity of 18.2%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.29%. On the other hand Robertet SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Robertet SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Robertet SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robertet SA has a beta of -0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.843%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Robertet SA offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.08 per share. Arkema SA pays 60.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Robertet SA pays out 29.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Robertet SA quarterly revenues of --. Arkema SA's net income of $129.8M is higher than Robertet SA's net income of --. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Robertet SA's PE ratio is 20.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.55x versus 2.39x for Robertet SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vicat SA has a net margin of 4.93% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of --. Arkema SA's return on equity of 4.74% beat Vicat SA's return on equity of 8.91%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.29%. On the other hand Vicat SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Vicat SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Vicat SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vicat SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Vicat SA offers a yield of 5.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share. Arkema SA pays 60.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Vicat SA pays out 36.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Vicat SA quarterly revenues of --. Arkema SA's net income of $129.8M is higher than Vicat SA's net income of --. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Vicat SA's PE ratio is 5.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.55x versus 0.41x for Vicat SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.