Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Buy
52
PWZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.59
Seasonality move
:
-0.05%
Day range:
$24.52 - $24.64
52-week range:
$24.25 - $25.49
Dividend yield:
3.3%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
47.5K
Avg. volume:
134.5K
1-year change:
-1.17%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
$24.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.3% | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
$10.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 4.5% | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
$9.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.65% | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
$5.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 3.35% | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
$9.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.24% | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
$6.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 3.19% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.947 | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | 1.154 | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | 1.226 | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | 1.868 | -- | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 0.905 | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | 2.013 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PWZ or CEV?
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PWZ or CEV?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust, analysts believe Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is PWZ or CEV More Risky?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.774%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWZ or CEV?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PWZ or CEV?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PWZ or EVM?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PWZ or EVM?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund, analysts believe Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 -
Is PWZ or EVM More Risky?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.439%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWZ or EVM?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PWZ or EVM?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PWZ or PCK?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PWZ or PCK?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II, analysts believe Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II0 0 0 -
Is PWZ or PCK More Risky?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a beta of 2.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.404%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWZ or PCK?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PWZ or PCK?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PWZ or PCQ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PWZ or PCQ?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is PWZ or PCQ More Risky?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWZ or PCQ?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PWZ or PCQ?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PWZ or PZC?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PWZ or PZC?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III, analysts believe Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III0 0 0 -
Is PWZ or PZC More Risky?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a beta of 2.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.406%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWZ or PZC?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PWZ or PZC?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III quarterly revenues of --. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's net income of --. Notably, Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
53
ARQQ alert for Dec 26
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 2.02% over the past day.
