Why Did Warren Buffett Buy Amazon Stock?
When investors think of tech stocks in Warren Buffett’s portfolio,…
Buy
53
FLHK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.15
Seasonality move
:
-5.37%
Day range:
$19.13 - $19.25
52-week range:
$15.40 - $21.03
Dividend yield:
4.34%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3K
Avg. volume:
5.5K
1-year change:
14.64%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
$19.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 4.34% | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
$30.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.59 | 5.38% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$19.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 3.94% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$23.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 4.1% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$36.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.66% | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
$14.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 3.97% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.073 | -- | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.983 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.246 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.612 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.654 | -- | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.797 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or ECNS?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or ECNS?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or ECNS More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.807%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or ECNS?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or ECNS?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or EWH?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or EWH More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.188%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or EWH?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or EWH?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or FCA?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or FCA More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.73%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or FCA?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or FCA?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or FXI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or FXI More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or FXI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or FXI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or RAYC?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or RAYC?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or RAYC More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or RAYC?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or RAYC?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will RocketLab Stock Be In 5 Years?
Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) closed recently at around $30 per share,…
Is MO dividend Worth It?
Altria Group (NYSE: MO) is paying investors $1.02 a share…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
88
CDTX alert for Jun 24
Cidara Therapeutics [CDTX] is up 113.42% over the past day.
Sell
46
HIMS alert for Jun 24
Hims & Hers Health [HIMS] is down 34.62% over the past day.
Buy
67
WGS alert for Jun 24
GeneDx Holdings [WGS] is up 18.69% over the past day.
